Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Burning Down the House of Horrors, Again

It’s rare for news media to recycle headliners. A few years ago, the title “the house of horrors” was used to describe the gruesome findings ofeleven African-American women who had been murdered and hidden in a Cleveland home by Anthony Sowell. This week, as the case of Ariel Castro unfolds with details of how he abducted, raped, and held three women captive in his Cleveland home, the “house of horrors” cloud has once again descended on the Cleveland skyline. The questions and inquiries as to how so many women went missing and were held in common houses, plotted on ordinary streets with everyday activity bustling around them has raised intense questions over the consequences of the United States cultural proclivity to live in, as Connie Schultz describes, “a community of strangers.” How did these women disappear without a trace? How did community fail these women?

It’s rare for news media to recycle headliners. A few years ago, the title “the house of horrors” was used to describe the gruesome findings ofeleven African-American women who had been murdered and hidden in a Cleveland home by Anthony Sowell. This week, as the case of Ariel Castro unfolds with details of how he abducted, raped, and held three women captive in his Cleveland home, the “house of horrors” cloud has once again descended on the Cleveland skyline.

The questions and inquiries as to how so many women went missing and were held in common houses, plotted on ordinary streets with everyday activity bustling around them has raised intense questions over the consequences of the United States cultural proclivity to live in, as Connie Schultz describes, “a community of strangers.” How did these women disappear without a trace? How did community fail these women?

The role community plays in preventing, disrupting, and healing the ongoing violence perpetrated against women is multifaceted. Being a “real neighbor” is a general abstraction that can be described for kind tasks of helping mow lawns, taking care of pets, inviting a new resident over for dinner, or helping with a household project. These tasks can be done as a good neighbor and can easily be completed by people who commit the most unthinkable acts of misogyny and abuse. Being a “real neighbor” though is not enough to end the abhorrent occurrences of kidnapping, torture, and sexual abuse.

If a house is the symbolism of community, perhaps Cleveland – one of the prominent cities in the “heart of it all” Ohio – is the best reflection of where the United States stands as a community committed to ending violence against women. Cleveland is reeling alright, but it has been for years after the economic recession that has toppled its real estate value, forced evictions, foreclosures, and unemployment in record numbers. The forced silence onto our communities is deafening. But Cleveland is not the only city with its house of horrors. As poverty is one of the leading social factors contributing to sexual violence, those who want to see an end to crimes like this must do more than pay lip service to community and neighborly behaviors. To combat sexual violence, the very foundations of poverty, silence, resources, and cultural trends must be addressed on a local level. National and even international conversation about violence against women triggers a small flame, but to burn the houses of horror, it will take individual communities to set it ablaze with open and progressive dialogue, mental health screening, job placement, accessible health and reproductive care, and educational opportunities for economic advancement.

These factors may or may not have prevented Ariel Castro or Anthony Sowell from committing their crimes, but no knows what kind of benefits the United States would reap if we safeguarded our communities with both resources and relationship, standardized the worth of girls and women to law enforcement instead of hinging their lives on luck and miracle. The role of community is critical, yes, but the livelihood of that very community is critical to its ability to forge a vociferous cry against heinous crimes in their own neighborhoods. No amount of international or national conversation will transform a city, it must stand up on its own feet to its own demons.

The residents of Seymour Avenue are understandably shocked and ashamed that these three young women have endured hell on the street they call home. But violence against women has set up its (metaphorical) houses of horror in every city in the United States. Its foundations are laid early. The scaffolding increases with time. Tragically, houses of horror are built even though the outside looks just like every other house on the block. In this past week, Cleveland received yet another mind-boggling wake-up call that we have failed our young girls and women. We, all of us, can redeem ourselves, if we’re willing. The next step is to move beyond the guilt and help all survivors rebuild their lives by not just rebuilding but redefining what community means in the face of a burning house.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.