Skip to content Skip to footer

Bondi Says Trump Will Defy Judge, Continue Deportations

“I don’t care what the judges think. I don’t care what the Left thinks. We’re coming,” said “border czar” Tom Homan.

Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks at the Justice Department March 14, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

On Monday, Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the Trump administration would “absolutely” continue expelling Venezuelan immigrants from the U.S., despite a federal judge’s order temporarily halting the deportations.

“These are foreign terrorists, that the president has identified them, and designated them as such, and we will continue to follow the Alien Enemies Act [AEA],” Bondi said on Fox News on Monday.

Chief Judge James Boasberg of the district court for the District of Columbia issued a nationwide temporary restraining order barring the removal of noncitizens in U.S. custody on March 15, after the ACLU, Democracy Forward and the ACLU of the District of Columbia sued the administration, challenging its use of the AEA.

Historically, the AEA grants the president the power to detain, restrict, and deport nationals of a foreign country engaged in active hostilities against the United States during wartime. The plaintiffs argue in the complaint that invoking the law outside its intended wartime context to sidestep domestic legal protections is against federal law and violates due process.

Boasberg agreed with plaintiffs on Saturday, writing in his order restraining the administration from expelling people under the AEA for 14 days that “the President can invoke the AEA only in a state of ‘declared war,’ or when an ‘invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government.’”

At least two flights carrying migrants were already en route to El Salvador and Honduras during this time, but Boasberg had verbally told the administration to halt and turn around all flights. Despite the judge’s instructions, at least one plane landed in El Salvador after his ruling, with passengers handed over to Salvadoran authorities. According to The Washington Post, some deported individuals were reportedly misidentified as gang members and signed deportation papers under the mistaken belief that they would be returned to Venezuela to reunite with their families — only to find themselves sent to a Salvadoran prison instead.

In a court filing, the ACLU and Democracy Forward accused the administration of a “blatant violation” of the restraining order, as senior Trump administration officials openly dismissed the order. Vice President J.D. Vance bragged about the forced transfers on X, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio retweeted a post by El Salvador President Nayib Bukele that mocked the judge’s decision, saying, “Oopsie… Too late,” alongside a laughing emoji.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller also targeted Boasberg and his jurisdiction directly, telling reporters on Monday that “It is without doubt the most unlawful order a judge has issued in our lifetimes.”

“A district court judge has no authority to direct the national security operations of the executive branch. The president has operated the absolute apex of his constitutional authority,” he continued.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed in a statement that Boasberg does not have the authority to interfere with executive powers or foreign affairs. “[F]ederal courts generally have no jurisdiction over the President’s conduct of foreign affairs, his authorities under the Alien Enemies Act, and his core Article II powers to remove foreign alien terrorists from U.S. soil and repel a declared invasion,” she said.

Bondi also criticized Boasberg for trying “to meddle” in foreign affairs, claiming he had overstepped his authority. “You know, this one federal judge again thinks he can control foreign policy for the entire country, and he cannot,” she said on Fox News.

During a fact-finding hearing on Monday afternoon, Boasberg demanded an explanation for the administration’s apparent defiance of his order. “So when I said directly to turn those planes around, the idea that my written order was pithier, that this could be disregarded, that’s a heck of a stretch,” he said.

Boasberg then ordered the government to respond on Tuesday to a series of questions about the flights, their passengers, and the precise timing of Trump’s proclamation directing the removal of alleged gang members. He also demanded that an additional legal briefing be filed on the case’s arguments.

Despite the court order remaining in effect, U.S. “border czar” Tom Homan told Fox News on Monday, “We’re not stopping.”

“I don’t care what the judges think. I don’t care what the Left thinks. We’re coming,” he added.

While the Justice Department has appealed the nationwide restraining order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit., the Trump administration is also seeking to transfer the case to a different judge. Meanwhile, Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) has announced plans to initiate impeachment proceedings against Boasberg, which is part of a broader effort by conservatives to target judges who have issued rulings adverse to Trump’s policies.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 9 days to add 500 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.