After pressure from progressives and some centrists, the White House is considering expanding the infrastructure bill, increasing spending to $4 trillion and raising tax increases to $3.5 trillion, The Washington Post reports. The initial version of the White House’s bill contained $3 trillion in spending and $1 trillion in tax hikes to help pay for it.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) reportedly helped orchestrate the proposed increases in spending and tax hikes. The expansion of the tax increases was made to appease moderates who were concerned about government spending.
It was previously reported that the tax hikes would include raising the corporate tax from 21 to 28 percent, as well as increasing taxes on wealthy individuals and shareholders. Under the initial proposal, the highest income tax rate would rise from 37 to 39.6 percent. It would also limit deductions that the wealthy can claim.
It’s unclear whether the new tax hike proposals make these increases larger or if they add new categories of expansion, but the administration believes the hikes can help lessen income inequality, those familiar with the plan told The Washington Post. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Monday that tax hikes and other revenue raisers are designed to pay for the entire infrastructure bill.
Centrist Democrats are split on their support for the infrastructure bill and the tax hikes. Senators Angus King (I-Maine) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-New Hampshire) told The Hill that they want the infrastructure bill to have spending offsets, which the tax hikes could achieve. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) has proposed that the corporate tax be raised from 21 to 25 percent, less than the increase in the White House proposal.
Other Democrats, however, are energized by the prospect of using the infrastructure bill to begin addressing the climate crisis and want to avoid a potentially controversial tax hike that might prevent passage. “My bigger issue is that we get an infrastructure and climate bill. If tax reform is part of how we get there, I’m all for that. If it’s a distraction, then I’m not,” Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-New Mexico) told The Hill. Considering Republicans’ staunchly unified opposition to the widely popular American Rescue Plan, however, it’s unlikely that any concessions, big or small, would get them on board.
Senator Schumer said he’s talking to centrists in his caucus to maximize his options in order to ensure the package’s eventual passage, which he hopes can be achieved through budget reconciliation like the stimulus package. Normally, budget reconciliation can only be used once per year, but since Congress didn’t pass a budget resolution this year, Democrats can use it a second — or maybe even a third — time to try to pass President Joe Biden’s infrastructure bill.
Republicans are likely to try to cut down spending in the infrastructure bill and oppose the tax hikes on the wealthy and corporations, since these provisions would undo some of former President Donald Trump’s tax cuts.
Progressives, on the other hand, have advocated for a larger infrastructure bill and higher and more ambitious taxes on the wealthy. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) recently proposed raising the corporate tax rate to 35 percent — what it was before Republicans and Trump cut it dramatically in 2017. Sanders also proposed a dramatic progressive increase to the estate tax, as well as lowering the threshold for exemptions.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) has also introduced a tax bill which would create a 2 percent tax on wealth over $50 million and a 3 percent tax on wealth over $1 billion. Though Sanders’s and Warren’s proposals likely wouldn’t pass on their own, due to the Senate filibuster, they could have a chance at passing if they were folded into the budget reconciliation vote for the infrastructure bill.
In tandem with calls for higher tax rates on the wealthy, progressives have proposed more ambitious spending on infrastructure. The recent increase in the bill might satisfy that need for 16 environmental and labor groups who wrote a letter calling for Biden, Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to increase the bill to at least $4 trillion, which Manchin has said he’d be okay with. The groups say that a larger bill would better suit the challenges the country is facing with the COVID-impacted economy and climate crisis.
Some lawmakers have called for even bigger spending. Lawmakers in the Congressional Progressive Caucus on Monday unveiled a $10 trillion infrastructure, climate and racial justice bill called the THRIVE Act, which would invest $1 trillion a year over the next decade. The THRIVE Act and corresponding agenda, proponents say, are a vital down payment on the Green New Deal. If it gains traction, it could be a progressive counterpart to Biden’s bill.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 253 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy