In a stark statement, President Joe Biden has admitted that the widely decried U.S. bombing campaign in Yemen isn’t actually having an effect on the Houthi blockade — but vowed to continue the bombings anyway.
Outside of the White House on Thursday, a reporter asked Biden if the airstrikes in Yemen have been “working.”
“Well, when you say ‘working,’ are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they going to continue? Yes,” Biden replied.
The U.S. has launched five rounds of strikes in Yemen in Houthi-controlled areas so far, with the U.K. also engaging in its own attacks; one of the rounds of U.S. strikes was launched shortly after Biden’s remark, as promised.
The strikes are the latest in a long campaign of U.S. repression and violence in Yemen, in which attacks using U.S. weapons have fueled a major humanitarian crisis in the region — a situation that advocates against the U.S. and U.K. strikes say is only made worse by Biden’s reimposing of a “specially designated global terrorist” label on the Houthis.
Biden’s frank statement has been widely ridiculed by progressives who maintain that the bombings, done without the direct approval of Congress, are unconstitutional and a severe overstep in power by the Biden administration to further destabilize the Middle East.
To many, the statement was symbolic of how the U.S. typically engages in military actions in the Middle East and with foreign policy in general — “Biden’s foreign policy in a nutshell,” The Nation writer Jeet Heer wrote on social media.
“‘A failure, but we’ll keep doing it anyway.’ Finally, a President is honest about US foreign policy,” said Guardian columnist Owen Jones.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-California) also chimed in, saying that Biden should rethink his approach. “Glad [Biden] agrees with me that the strikes are not working. Next time come to Congress instead of [controversial Middle East White House Adviser Brett] McGurk,” Khanna wrote.
It’s possible, perhaps likely, that Biden’s comment doesn’t mean that he believes the strikes will not eventually succeed— rather, he may mean that they haven’t yet stopped the blockade entirely. But anti-war advocates have long noted that the U.S.’s military incursions abroad are rarely effective at their stated mission, citing the suffering and widespread civilian death caused by the U.S.’s catastrophic war in Afghanistan as a recent example.
In the same way, advocates have been warning that the current bombing campaign could only serve to further empower the Houthis in the long term, while contributing to an extremely volatile situation in the Middle East and causing yet more suffering at the hands of the U.S. empire.
“Along with deploying aircraft carriers to ’deter Iran,’ the United States says it is launching attacks against targets inside Yemen to ’degrade Houthi rebels’ ability,’”wrote Institute for Policy Studies fellow Phyllis Bennis for In These Times this week. “But years of far more intensive U.S.-backed Saudi bombing have failed to destroy Houthi military capacity, and this campaign will similarly fail to achieve the stated objectives.”
To The Intercept’s Ryan Grim, meanwhile, Biden’s statement was somewhat of a confession as to the efficacy of the decades of U.S. military intervention in the Middle East. “There’s zero reason to think these sanctions or these airstrikes will get them to stop their blockade of shipping,” Grim wrote. “It’s amazing to see Biden admit it.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.