Skip to content Skip to footer

Bid to Knock Rahm Emanuel Off Ballot for Chicago Mayor: Can it Succeed?

Chicago – A challenge filed Friday to invalidate Rahm Emanuel’s candidacy in the Chicago mayoral race, says Mr. Emanuel’s campaign, is a political trick by forces looking to “hijack” the election in February.

Chicago – A challenge filed Friday to invalidate Rahm Emanuel’s candidacy in the Chicago mayoral race, says Mr. Emanuel’s campaign, is a political trick by forces looking to “hijack” the election in February.

Chicago area election lawyer Burt Odelson filed his challenge to the Chicago Board of Elections, saying that Emanuel does not meet a state law that requires all candidates to be residents of the municipality in which they seek office for at least one year. He filed on behalf of two Chicago residents; on Wednesday, five other challenges were filed separately. Tuesday is the last day objections can be filed to the election board.

Central to Mr. Odelson’s argument is that Emanuel was removed from voter rolls twice during his two-year tenure in Washington, when he served as White House chief of staff to President Obama. During that time, Emanuel rented out his home. His campaign says he maintained ties to the city by paying property taxes, maintaining a driver’s license, and voting in the February primary.

The challenges are likely to complicate Emanuel’s campaign, in that a cloud of uncertainty will loom over his candidacy and he will likely be forced to address the issue in public appearances.

Odelson could not be reached by phone Friday by press time. He told WGN radio this week that because the voter rolls cannot prove Emanuel was a resident, he is flauting the state law, suggesting that his voting status may have been reactivated through insider connections. “[Emanuel] voted in the February 2010 primary. On face, that doesn’t say you voted here correctly,” Odelson said.

Odelson added that a 1943 provision of the law exempted active members of the military from the one-year requirement.

In a teleconference with reporters Friday organized by the Emanuel campaign, US Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D) of Illinois argued that the legislation was intended to include all individuals who left their hometowns to serve their country, whether in the military or some other capacity. “I would certainly say the chief of staff to the president [qualifies Emanuel under the law] … if that isn’t public service and a reason to leave your city to serve your country, I don’t know what is,” Representative Schakowsky says.

Several of Emanuel’s challengers in the race have cited the residency issue. The Emanuel campaign is asking the other candidates to declare that they have no connections to Odelson, suggesting that political operatives opposing Emanuel are behind the challenge.

“It’s time for the circus to come to the end,” says Schakowsky. “Insiders,” she adds, are trying to “hijack the election” by restricting voter choice.

Phone calls to spokespeople representing candidates Gery Chico and former US Sen. Carol Moseley Braun were not returned at press time Friday.

A poll by the Chicago Retail Merchants Association released Wednesday has Emanuel as a frontrunner, favored by 39 percent of respondents. Ms. Moseley Braun and Mr. Chico came in a distant second and third, garnering 12 percent and 9 percent of prospective voters, respectively.

The Board of Elections will hold a hearing on the residency issue in early December.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy