Attorney General Bill Barr’s decision to abruptly replace a career official who led a Justice Department office that oversees the legality of national security policy with a political appointee sparked concerns among national security officials, according to ABC News.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brad Wiegmann, a 23-year career official who headed the DOJ National Security Division’s Office of Law and Policy, was told that he was being reassigned two weeks ago, according to the report.
Wiegmann was replaced with Kellen Dwyer, a 36-year-old cyber-crimes prosecutor who joined the DOJ six years earlier. Dwyer previously made headlines in 2018 when he accidentally revealed secret charges that had been filed against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
“It’s very alarming,” Katrina Mulligan, who served under Wiegmann, told ABC News, adding that Dwyer’s limited experience made him a “very odd” choice to replace an official she described as an “exceptional” manager.
The Office of Law and Policy is charged with ensuring that federal counterintelligence and counterterrorism activities don’t violate the law. Mulligan said the office is tasked with telling officials “what you want to do… is illegal” and then “try to offer them alternatives that weren’t illegal.”
The team is heavily involved in National Security Council meetings, conducts oversight of FBI intelligence-gathering, and helps congressional staff draft legislation.
“[It] has been sort of the center of gravity for the Department of Justice on national security policy, and it’s a central role,” Matt Olsen, the former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, told ABC.
Mulligan expressed concern that a political appointee would now have influence over policy regarding “what we will and won’t do overseas and at home” in terms of surveillance and when “it is and isn’t appropriate” for the DOJ to inform the public about election interference.
“The concern here is that you have someone who by all accounts has been doing a great job in a very sensitive role,” Olsen added, “[and] now within really just weeks of the election is replaced with somebody who is viewed more as a partisan.”
The Justice Department declined to say why Wiegmann was replaced.
“Brad doesn’t have a political bone in his body” and “has been such an uncontroversial person in that role for such a long time,” Mulligan told ABC, adding that he “was trying to advance the policies that this administration wanted to advance.”
Olsen said that given Barr’s efforts to intervene in matters related to President Donald Trump, the department does not “get the presumption of the doubt when it comes to making personnel decisions like this.”
A DOJ spokesperson told the outlet that Weigmann “continues to serve a vital role in the front office of the National Security Division,” adding that the office had been staffed by “political appointees and career staff since its inception.”
A current federal official pushed back on that claim.
“It would not have been that unusual early in an administration to place a political [appointee] in that policy role, but to do that now is very unusual,” the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told ABC.
Barr has frequently been accused of politicizing the DOJ by intervening in criminal cases related to the president’s former advisers and echoing Trump’s baseless conspiracy theories about mail voting.
Those moves have raised fears among even Republicans that the DOJ may seek to influence the election.
“Barr has utterly and completely trashed the norm of DOJ separation from politics,” Donald Ayer, who served as the deputy attorney general under President George H.W. Bush, told The Intercept. “For the last several months, Barr has been fully engaged in using the tools of the Justice Department primarily for the purpose of advancing the president’s election prospects.”
Barr has also teased that the DOJ is trying to wrap up US Attorney John Durham’s investigation into the federal Trump-Russia probe “before the election” even though the department traditionally avoids making public information that could affect the race 60 to 90 days before the election. Former FBI Director James Comey infamously ignored that tradition when he made public statements about the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
“It seems inevitable that Barr will attempt to unleash an October surprise through the Durham investigation,” former DOJ prosecutor Paul Rosenzweig told The Intercept.
“Given his past misrepresentations of the Mueller report,” added fellow former DOJ prosecutor Justin Levitt, “the American people should look very carefully and very skeptically at absolutely anything Barr announces this year.”
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $81,000 in one-time donations and to add 1250 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy