“My god.”
That was the initial two-word reaction of Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) late Thursday night after CBS News aired an interview with U.S. Attorney General William Barr who declared that “history is written by the winners” when asked how he thought historians would view the Justice Department’s dropping of charges against President Donald Trump’s former national security advisor Michael Flynn earlier in the day.
REPORTER: How will history look back on your decision to drop charges against Flynn?
BILL BARR: “Well, history is written by the winners. So it largely depends on who’s writing the history.” pic.twitter.com/GVr2bIaavc
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 7, 2020
To critics like Murphy, Barr’s response was a clear betrayal of the standards that should be upheld by the Justice Department and the American legal system.
“The entire idea of the rule of law — that thing the Attorney General is supposed to be in charge of upholding — is predicated on the outcome of elections NOT mattering when it comes to the operation of the legal system,” Murphy said.
After the DOJ’s decision to drop charges against Flynn there was no shortage of outrage directed at Barr, with many critics saying it appeared to be a direct effort to help the president politically.
“Barr has consistently acted for the personal and political benefit of President Trump, rather than fulfilling his duty as chief law enforcement officer of the United States,” said Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).
AG BARR NEEDS TO RESIGN
AG BARR NEEDS TO RESIGN
AG BARR NEEDS TO RESIGN
AG BARR NEEDS TO RESIGN
AG BARR NEEDS TO RESIGN
AG BARR NEEDS TO RESIGNHow many times do we need to say this?https://t.co/K9qHyhPRIi
— Citizens for Ethics (@CREWcrew) May 8, 2020
Legal experts, meanwhile, said the DOJ maneuvers related to the Flynn case were unprecedented.
“I’ve been practicing for more time than I care to admit and I’ve never seen anything like this,” Julie O’Sullivan, a former federal prosecutor who now teaches criminal law at Georgetown University, told the New York Times.
The Justice Department filing does not show Michael Flynn is innocent. He still lied to the @FBI, a felony. He still violated FARA, a federal offense.
AG Bill Barr made a transparently political decision that further shreds the credibility of the Justice Dept. https://t.co/ZAhaBknTZA
— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) May 7, 2020
But Barr’s deflection of such criticisms — delivered with what the Daily Beast characterized as “a sly smile” — during the CBS interview sparked even further alarm.
“The head of the American justice system now saying publicly that there is no good or bad except what the strongest want. The definition of autocracy,” tweeted writer and director Adam Stein in response.
Political science professor Robert E. Kelly, who teaches at the Pusan National University in South Korea, said it’s “kinda mind-blowing that the US equivalent of the justice minister is embracing might-makes-right historiography. [Isn’t] his job literally the opposite?”
In the U.S. meanwhile, journalist and left-leaning columnist Will Bunch suggested it was time to put Barr’s theory of history and justice to the test.
“We need to win in November and write the history of how Bill Barr spent the rest of his life in prison,” Bunch quipped.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.