Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Banking Groups Stir Consumer Fears on Debit Card Regulations via Twitter

It’s April 21, and another Dodd-Frank deadline has come and gone. Today was the day the Fed's regulations on debit card transaction fees, also known as interchange fees, were supposed to be finalized. Hasn't happened. Controversy over the regulations caused the Fed to postpone finalizing the rules. But that win alone wasn't enough for the banks, which have rallied behind legislation to delay the rules by at least another year.

It’s April 21, and another Dodd-Frank deadline has come and gone. Today was the day the Fed's regulations on debit card transaction fees, also known as interchange fees, were supposed to be finalized. Hasn't happened.

Controversy over the regulations caused the Fed to postpone finalizing the rules. But that win alone wasn't enough for the banks, which have rallied behind legislation to delay the rules by at least another year.

Today they took to Twitter to continue the push, launching a “Save My Debit Card” campaign and asking people to “tell us why you love your debit card today—and why you don't want that to change!”

The strange thing about this campaign is that debit cards aren't in danger—not from the proposed regulations, at least. Some consumers participating in the #savemydebitcard campaign don't seem to know that.

Participants have been tweeting that they love their debit cards because they “hate carrying loose change,” they can track what they spend (that one's from the spokeswoman for the group in charge of the campaign), and because “it's easy to use and faster than writing a check.” One noted that debit cards “eliminate lbs of paper waste.”

Those are all things that the proposed rules wouldn't actually change. The Fed's plan would limit the size of the per-transaction fees that merchants give to banks—and that's only for banks with more than $10 billion in assets.

Merchants and banks have given indications of how this fee cap would affect consumers. Merchants have promised that what they save in fees will result in lower costs to consumers. Of course that's not guaranteed to happen, and not everyone buys that it will.

Banks have warned they may end debit card rewards, increase ATM fees, get rid of “free” checking, or limit the size of debit purchases, as we've noted. These threats have caused some consumers to rally against rules that could lower the costs of the goods they purchase.

Big banks also have made timely contributions to the campaign coffers of Sen. Jon Tester, the Montana Democrat who proposed the legislation to delay the rule. Here's The Hill:

Six days after Tester introduced his legislation, which would delay implementation of the regulations by between 12 months and 18 months, executives at TCF Financial gave his campaign nearly $16,000 in contributions, including $9,000 from the company's political action committee.

That same day, Tester received $500 contributions from two executives at Wells Fargo; $2,500 from Richard Davis, president and CEO of US Bancorp, as well as $1,000 from the company's political action committee; $1,000 from Bank of America's PAC; and $1,500 from Discover Financial Services' PAC.

A few days later, the American Bankers Association delivered a $5,000 contribution.

The banking industry and the merchants coalition have each hired more than a hundred former government officials to lobby for their interests, according to Sunlight Foundation.

All the lobbying has resulted in a good amount of spin. Some consumers still seem utterly confused about the regulation and about who would benefit.

“Keep the Government from taking more of our good hard earned money,” wrote one Twitter user. Wrote another: “I love my debit card because I am able to use my money for things I need rather than pay for all those bank ceo 'bonuses.'”

Sounds like they could use an explainer or two.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy