Skip to content Skip to footer

Sections

Trending

Latest

More

© 2024 Truthout
Op-Ed
|

Are Global Committees of Trans-Correspondence Possible?

Now that a global interconnectedness appears to have taken form, what would happen if Global Committees of Trans-Correspondence were established?

By
For the purpose of urging Patriots in other towns “to state the Rights of the Colonists of this Province,” Samuel Adams persuaded a Boston town meeting to establish a Committee of Correspondence. The year was 1772 and the Gaspee, a British Royal customs vessel in Rhode Island, had just been burned. Consequently, the British government broadened its powers, particularly in sending colonists to Britain to be tried for high treason. Within days, Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson agreed that a revolutionary network of writing committees should be established to link the colonies. By mid-1773, almost every colonial assembly had Committees of Correspondence, expressing the various ideals of freedoms and liberties, even independence. A growing political awareness took shape too as other perceived injustices were communicated, and as local forums discussed and debated the principles of equality and rights.
Now that a global interconnectedness appears to have taken form, what would happen if Global Committees of Trans-Correspondence were established? Indeed, would it be possible to have political leaders and non-governmental organizations from one nation pen and exchange their ideas and grievances with the mainstream press of other nations? The New York Times did just this when it published Russian President Vladimir Putin’s op-ed. For the very first time, Americans were privy to President Putin’s desires, asking President Barack Obama not to attack Syria, and warning “insufficient communication” still exists between the two societies.” He also expressed how international laws and consensus building should be respected before going to war, how conflicts can needlessly escalate and result in innocent civilians dying, and that America’s alarming interventions in foreign countries had become commonplace and not in its best long-term interest.(1)
A Russian newspaper then printed Senator John McCain’s letter, another case of global trans-correspondence. Russians read how he thought he was “more pro-Russian than President Putin,” even attacking his character. Russians, wrote Senator McCain, deserve someone better. Next he listed a litany of Russia’s weaknesses and corruptions, including supposed individual human rights abuses. Finally, he criticized President Putin for intervening in Syria’s Civil War, and for pressuring the government in destroying its chemical weapons.(2) Although many found Senator McCain’s op-ed degrading, even misinformed and ethnocentric, it still served as a starting point in how some Americans perceive the world. On the contrary, President Putin’s letter was poignant, dealing entirely with civil diplomacy, how Russia and America were allies in defeating the Nazis, and the dangers of lethal militarism, of always using the “language of force.”
Both mainstream newspapers should be praised for their freedoms of expression and of the press. In response to Senator McCain’s fallacical argument, of aggressively attacking and demeaning the person instead of the person’s policies, Global Committees of Tran-Correspondence could possibly agree on a framework of rules and regulations. Letters should be civil and appropriate, free from “character assassinations.” And like President Putin’s correspondence, which emphasized solving the Israeli-Palestinian issue, and the nuclear dispute between the US and Iran, without bloodshed and war, letters should emphasize commonalities, the importance of working together and more conciliatory approaches. Just think how Global Trans-Correspondences could create a new revolution in writing and thinking and speaking, something the internet is already doing as it gives voices to the Many from various parts of the world.
The original colonial Committees of Correspondence politicized ordinary townspeople, sparking a revolutionary language of rights and responsibilities. They also broadened the concepts of liberty and equality. Through the power of freely sharing ideals and information through letters, the first Constitutional Convention was arranged. This led to other popular movements and the seminal Declaration of Independence, which led to the American Revolution and the birth of a new nation. At least for the United States, another revolution is desperately needed. It is a revolution in re-perceiving its own identity, of re-thinking its role and purpose in world affairs. A revolution of re-imagining the world, of becoming more globally conscientious and aware of other peoples and their views, would greatly benefit Americans. Visualize what would happen if President Obama and Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani not only exchanged one private letter,(3) but several, having them published in both nation’s mainstream presses.
Try and imagine too what would have happened if political leaders and nongovernmental organizations from Iraq and Afghanistan could have made known their ideals, histories, and grievances in the American mainstream press. Perhaps then, the sword would not have been more powerful than the pen. The highest form of treason is not necessarily individual-sponsored treason but state-sponsored, of betraying the people by censoring them and then leading them into unnecessary wars.
(1) Putin’s New York Times op-ed, annotated and fact-checked.
(2) Pravda McCain slams Vladimir Putin.
(3) Obama finds a pen pal in Iran.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy