Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday voiced frustration with what she characterized as Democratic leaders’ efforts to shut progressives out of key policy negotiations, a message that came as the details of a roughly $900 billion coronavirus relief package began to slowly trickle out just ahead of an expected vote.
“One major difference between GOP and Dems is that [Republicans] leverage their right flank to gain policy concessions and generate enthusiasm, while Dems lock their left flank in the basement [because] they think that will make Republicans be nicer to them,” the New York Democrat tweeted, referencing Republican leaders’ decision to rally around Sen. Pat Toomey’s (R-Pa.) last-minute push to curtail the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending powers in the relief bill.
Toomey’s original provision — which Democrats slammed as an effort to sabotage the incoming Biden administration — was narrowed significantly in negotiations late Saturday, but the Pennsylvania Republican said Sunday that he is “very pleased” with the outcome.
Under the compromise agreement, according to the Wall Street Journal, “$429 billion previously provided to the Treasury Department to backstop losses in Fed lending programs would be revoked, and the Fed wouldn’t be able to replicate identical emergency lending programs next year without congressional approval. But the agreement wouldn’t prevent the Fed from starting other similar programs.”
As negotiations over much-needed coronavirus relief accelerated rapidly over the past week, Ocasio-Cortez and other progressives publicly aired their outrage at the exclusion of key priorities and the overall inadequacy of the package, which will ultimately be much smaller than even the pared-back version of the HEROES Act that the House passed in October. The total size of that package was around $2.2 trillion.
The relief legislation that’s expected to be unveiled and potentially passed Sunday includes $600 direct payments to many Americans and a $300 weekly boost to unemployment benefits — both significantly smaller than what Democratic leaders have supported in the past. Progressive lawmakers have pushed for direct payments of at least $1,200 per adult — a proposal supported by 88% of likely voters — and an unemployment boost of $600 a week.
The final package is also expected to include billions of dollars for vaccine distribution, rental assistance, and nutrition aid. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced on the Senate floor Sunday evening that congressional leaders have reached an agreement on the legislation, but bill text has yet to be made public.
“We can finally report what our nation has needed to hear for a very long time: More help is on the way,” said McConnell, who stood in the way of additional relief for months.
More help for who?
How are the millions of people facing evictions, remain unemployed, standing in food bank & soup kitchen lines supposed to live off of $600? We didn’t send help for 8 months.
This is not leadership. There is no compassion, just politics of greed and power. https://t.co/jaww6Ki9K3
— Rashida Tlaib (@RashidaTlaib) December 20, 2020
While noting that progressives did succeed in getting direct payments back on the negotiating table after they were excluded from an earlier bipartisan proposal, Ocasio-Cortez warned Friday that a one-time check of $600 is “not enough.”
“We want $1,200 at least. And Republicans are fighting it back down to $600, which is really unfortunate,” said the New York Democrat. “We need to really make sure that we hold the Republican Party accountable for cutting people’s stimulus checks in half.”
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) also criticized the size of the direct payments, saying in an interview Sunday that “the truth of the matter is $600 will not even cover a month’s rent.”
*** Latest on UI & checks in talks
Getting closer to final – if not already there
UI:
— $300/week for *11* weeks
— PUA, base benefits also +11 weeksChecks:
— $600 per child & adult
— No family cap
— Phase out +$75K
— Adult dependents back OUThttps://t.co/7JXp9JUylK— Jeff Stein (@JStein_WaPo) December 20, 2020
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) expressed alarm that, with a potential vote just hours away, she still has not seen any legislative text.
“Still not a peep on language. It will probably be another multi-billion-dollar bill, without real debate, floor amendments, introduced and passed probably within hours,” Omar tweeted. “No time for the public input or objections. What a complete nightmarish example of representative democracy.”
Last week, as Common Dreams reported, Omar said it is “really quite shameful that we find ourselves negotiating a deal with such a small amount of money when we know just how devastated the American people are across our country.
“Think about it: in March, we were able to send $1,200 checks to people and give them $600 in unemployment insurance benefits,” Omar said. “And now we’re talking about possibly sending a one-time check, eight months later, of $600 and reducing that unemployment benefit to $300.”
Republican leaders and members of the Trump administration, meanwhile, are reportedly satisfied with the success they’ve had in pulling Democratic leaders down from their initial demand for a multi-trillion-dollar relief package, which economists say is necessary to bring the U.S. economy out of deep recession and provide adequate help to desperate Americans.
While the final package is not expected to include any form of liability shield for businesses — a Republican priority — it will also exclude additional direct aid to crisis-ravaged state and local governments.
“I couldn’t be more pleased where we landed this,” Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin reportedly said during a GOP conference call on Sunday.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.