Amid the numerous revelations from The New York Times’s reporting on President Trump’s tax returns is the fact that he spent around $70,000 on hair styling appointments, writing those costs off as business expenses for his work on “The Apprentice.”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) took special note of those expenditures, reminding Republicans that in 2019 she was widely criticized for treating herself to one hair styling appointment that cost $250.
“Last year Republicans blasted a firehose of hatred + vitriol my way because I treated myself to a $250 cut & lowlights on my birthday,” she wrote in a tweet on Sunday night.
Ocasio-Cortez then directed this rhetorical question toward those who begrudged her a single $250 hair appointment but were not critical of the president’s hairstyling expenses. “Where’s the criticism of their idol spending $70k on hairstyling?” the congresswoman wrote. “Oh, it’s nowhere because they’re spineless, misogynistic hypocrites? Got it.”
Criticism of Ocasio-Cortez’s birthday hairstyling appointment poured down in response to an article in the right-leaning Washington Times. Republicans and other conservative media pounced on the reporting, using it as a means to suggest she was out of touch with regular Americans.
As it turns out, however, the amount that Ocasio-Cortez spent on her birthday cut was within the range that many women — not just the very rich — typically pay for the same services. As Rhonda Garelick, dean of art and design history and theory at Parsons School of Design, noted at the time, such comments made toward Ocasio-Cortez put on display misogynistic attitudes that many women in the U.S. have to deal with when it comes to their appearance and how much money they spend on it.
“While it is a societal convention that women maintain this complex level of grooming and self-adornment, they are sort of expected to make it seem ‘effortless,’ to draw no attention to the fact of this effort and expense,” Garelick said. “And there is real sexism in that — it’s additional labor. If women seem to ‘own’ this aspect of their social presentation, they are often punished.”
In addition to skewering Trump over his hairstyling costs, Ocasio-Cortez also pointed out that despite being a billionaire, Trump paid much less in taxes during the year he campaigned for president and his first year in office than she did while working as a bartender during those same years.
“In 2016 and ‘17, I paid thousands of dollars a year in taxes as a bartender. Trump paid $750” in both years, Ocasio-Cortez said.
Trump’s tactics for not paying taxes at all or paying far less than other Americans was disgraceful, she added.
“He contributed less to funding our communities than waitresses and undocumented immigrants,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote, describing the president as “a walking scam.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.