Federal legislation is being unveiled that would force the American Red Cross to do something that it has repeatedly resisted: open its books and operations to outside scrutiny.
The proposed American Red Cross Sunshine Act comes in response to a government report, also released this week, that finds oversight of the charity lacking and recommends Congress find a way to fill the gap.
The inquiry cites reporting by ProPublica and NPR about the Red Cross’ failures during Superstorm Sandy and misleading statements by CEO Gail McGovern about how the group has spent hundreds of millions of donated dollars.
The 18-month GAO examination was requested by Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., who also authored the proposed legislation. The bill would require regular government audits of the Red Cross’ finances, its response to disasters in the United States, and its work abroad.
“The public deserves and needs to know that money is going for which it is intended,” Thompson said in an interview, citing the troubled Red Cross responses after Hurricane Katrina, the earthquake in Haiti, and Superstorm Sandy.
Thompson said in an interview that the Red Cross did not cooperate fully with the inquiry, which the GAO confirmed.
“When you get pushback from the very beginning it creates doubts and suspicion in the minds of a lot of us,” Thompson said.
As we reported, last year McGovern tried unsuccessfully to get Thompson to shut down the inquiry by the GAO, which is the investigative arm of Congress.
Thompson said that McGovern’s request was the first of its kind he’d gotten in over 20 years in Congress.
The head of the GAO’s inquiry, Andrew Sherrill, said the Red Cross did not give “unfettered access” to investigators. Still, he said the GAO was able to get the information it needed. The report notes that while it reviewed Red Cross policies, it “did not assess the effectiveness or sufficiency” of the charity’s work.
In response to the pushback, Thompson added language to his bill saying the GAO can have access to any Red Cross records, including those related to the group’s “financial transactions and internal governance.”
The Red Cross did not respond to a question about its cooperation with the GAO inquiry.
In a statement on the report, the Red Cross stressed that it is not a federal agency. The group said it “believes there are several already existing mechanisms in place to evaluate our disaster response that provide considerable oversight.” The statement cited the group’s ombudsman office, its board of directors, and regular after-action reviews.
The Red Cross was chartered over a century ago by Congress and operates as a public-private hybrid: While it is funded mostly by private donations, it has an official role in the United States’ disaster response plan. The Red Cross receives a variety of benefits from the government, including tens of millions of dollars in funding in recent years. It also enjoys a one-dollar, 99-year lease on government land in Washington the charity uses for its headquarters.
If passed, Thompson’s bill would also:
-
Require audits by three inspectors general – the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, the Homeland Security Inspector General, and the USAID Inspector General – to be conducted at least once every three years and to be posted publicly online.
-
Require the Department of Homeland Security to submit to Congress an annual report on its partnerships with the Red Cross on “preparedness and response capabilities.”
-
Require the Red Cross to “make prominent on its website” information on how to submit concerns to the group’s ombudsman.
The bill’s prospects in the Republican-controlled House aren’t clear.
But Thompson said he’s hopeful because disasters are not a partisan issue. The charity is also facing pressure from Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, to answer questions about its Haiti response.
If you have information about the Red Cross, its disaster operations, or blood services email [email protected].
To anonymously send us documents online, visit our SecureDrop site.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.