The fatal police shooting of a Black, autistic teen in San Bernardino, California, has sparked renewed calls for alternative crisis intervention approaches for those with mental illness and disability. On March 9, 15-year-old Ryan Gainer returned home from a run and became increasingly frustrated with his parents after they demanded he complete his household chores before playing video games. A family member reportedly called police after Gainer began breaking glass and hitting his sister, but the responding deputies fatally shot Gainer for allegedly running toward authorities while holding a garden tool.
After releasing body camera footage, San Bernardino County Sheriff Shannon Dicus defended the deputies’ use of lethal force, at one point citing Gainer’s “large stature.” The comparison drew immediate criticism from civil rights advocates.
“One of the reasons for increased rates of use of force against Black youths is the consistent and unexamined portrayal of children in our community as adults,” said James Burch, deputy director of the Anti Police-Terror Project. “Ryan Gainer was a child. He should be with us today.”
Instances like this are a continued trend for disabled people of color. The San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department was sued last year after deputies fatally shot 44-year-old Tony Garza in the midst of a mental health crisis. Garza’s family has since filed a $20 million lawsuit against the county. Research shows that up to 50% of those killed by law enforcement in the U.S. are disabled, and more than half of disabled Black Americans are arrested by the time they turn 28. People with disabilities are also overrepresented in prisons and jails — according to survey data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, nearly 38% of incarcerated people in state and federal prisons reported at least one disability in 2016.
Systemic racism compounded by poverty, food insecurity, underfunded schools, lack of green space, and poor air quality can also contribute to an increased risk in chronic illnesses like asthma and diabetes, further impacting mental health in communities of color. These communities also lack accessible and unbiased medical care; a study published in Exceptional Children found that Black and Latinx youths were less likely to be identified with autism and learning disabilities than their white peers, thus divesting critical services away from families that need them — especially in response to crises.
Law enforcement’s focus on compliance can pose deadly consequences to disabled people experiencing crises. Those who struggle to communicate or respond to law enforcement’s requests as a result of their disability may inevitably face violence when encountering police.
“We see all too often unarmed Black people and children in particular [are] killed by police, and you layer on top of the racism, the implicit bias, the disability, and the lack of knowledge around disabilities is a lethal formula for our kids,” said Areva Martin, a civil rights attorney and founder of the Special Needs Network.
Most police departments in the U.S. still do not require de-escalation training for their officers. A 2016 report by the Police Executive Research Forum stated that police academies spend a median of 58 hours on firearm training and less than eight hours on de-escalation or crisis intervention training. Criminal justice advocates say the rise of Cop Cities combined with increased police funding and surveillance technology also pose a risk in increased police violence.
Many activists also say no amount of training will stop police from killing BIPOC disabled communities.
“This is a systemic thing, and it happens every day in this country — and most of the stories we don’t hear about,” said Kehsi Iman Wilson, COO and co-founder of disability justice organization New Disabled South. “We don’t hear about disabled Black men [and] boys who are being killed in carceral systems and jails, prisons, juvenile detention, facilities, etc. on a daily basis.”
Advocates like Wilson argue that, to dismantle the prison industrial complex and the government’s overuse of policing, surveillance, and imprisonment, communities must invest in mental health response teams and mutual aid.
“Whether it be through grassroots efforts or city-funded programs, we need as many alternatives as possible, so we can make sure that, when one of our community members [are] in crisis, there’s a great chance that law enforcement doesn’t show up,” Burch said.
In support of these alternative programs, many advocates point to how there is little evidence that police actually stop or reduce crime. A report from the Center on Juvenile & Criminal Justice found that crime clearance rates are at an all-time low, with California law enforcement agencies reportedly solving 13.2% of cases in 2022, compared to 22.3% in 1990. Conversely, law enforcement budgets in the state have soared by 52% in the past three decades.
“We have the data that clearly demonstrates that the police do not keep us safe, that police are an ineffective form of public safety,” Burch said. “We just need to be able to communicate that effectively across the fear-based rhetoric that’s being fed to our [communities].”
Some cities have already taken steps to implement these community-based public safety programs. In Oakland, the Mobile Assistance Community Responders of Oakland (MACRO) pilot program launched in April 2022, which consists of a civilian team of first responders who show up to non-violent and non-emergency 911 calls. Over the course of 18 months, the program made 15,000 total contacts, with 10,145 consisting of wellness checks. The program now has an established phone number to divert calls away from 911.
In Richmond, California, the Community Crisis Response program (CCRP) aims to respond to non-violent mental health crises in the city without police, fire, or other Emergency Management Services personnel. This differs from the MACRO program, which requires EMTs in addition to community intervention specialists. The 18-month pilot was set to begin last August of 2023. The city allocated $1 million from the American Rescue Plan, a federal COVID-19 relief reserve, to fund the program.
The barrier to these programs is ensuring that communities are informed and know that these resources are available. Activists say solidarity is needed to ensure the momentum continues.
“Silence is a part of the strategy,” Wilson said. “The news cycle will move on from this, but how are we in the communities keeping these conversations going? A lot of that goes back to demanding change from lawmakers and policymakers. It also requires cross movement solidarity, and disability solidarity. Taking up space as disabled people in those conversations and highlighting, again, how all of these actions are ultimately the key to our collective liberation.”
Prism is an independent and nonprofit newsroom led by journalists of color. We report from the ground up and at the intersections of injustice.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.