Skip to content Skip to footer

A War of Absurdity

Every once in a while, a statistic just jumps out at you in a way that makes everything else you hear on a subject seem beside the point, if not downright absurd.

There is no indication that any of the contending forces in Afghanistan, including
the Taliban, are interested in bringing al-Qaida back. On the contrary, all
the available evidence indicates that the Arab fighters are unwelcome and that
it is their isolation from their former patrons that has led to their demise.

Every once in a while, a statistic just jumps out at you in a way that makes
everything else you hear on a subject seem beside the point, if not downright
absurd. That was my reaction to the recent statement of the president’s national
security adviser, former Marine Gen. James Jones, concerning the size of the
terrorist threat from Afghanistan:

“The al-Qaida presence is very diminished. The maximum estimate is less
than 100 operating in the country, no bases, no ability to launch attacks on
either us or our allies.”

Less than 100! And he is basing his conservative estimate on the best intelligence
data available to our government. That means that al-Qaida, for all practical
purposes, does not exist in Afghanistan — so why are we having a big debate
about sending even more troops to fight an enemy that has relocated elsewhere?
Because of the blind belief, in the minds of those like John McCain, determined
to “win” in Afghanistan, that if we don’t escalate, al-Qaida will
inevitably come back.

Why? It’s not like al-Qaida is an evil weed indigenous to Afghanistan and dependent
on its climate and soil for survival. Its members were foreign imports in the
first place, recruited by our CIA to fight the Soviets because there were evidently
not enough locals to do the job. After all, U.S. officials first forged the
alliance between the foreign fighters and the Afghan mujahideen, who morphed
into the Taliban, and we should not be surprised that that tenuous alliance
ended. The Taliban and other insurgents are preoccupied with the future of Afghanistan,
while the Arab fighters couldn’t care less and have moved on to more hospitable
climes.

There is no indication that any of the contending forces in Afghanistan, including
the Taliban, are interested in bringing al-Qaida back. On the contrary, all
the available evidence indicates that the Arab fighters are unwelcome and that
it is their isolation from their former patrons that has led to their demise.

As such, while one wishes that the Afghan people would put their houses in
order, these are not — even after eight long years of occupation — our houses.
Sure, there are all sorts of angry people in Afghanistan, eager to pick fights
with each other and most of all any foreigners who seem to be threatening their
way of life, but why should that any longer have anything to do with us?

Even in neighboring Pakistan, the remnants of al-Qaida are barely hanging on.
As The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday, “Hunted by U.S. drones, beset
by money problems and finding it tougher to lure young Arabs to the bleak mountains
of Pakistan, al-Qaida is seeing its role shrink there and in Afghanistan, according
to intelligence reports and Pakistan and U.S. officials. … For Arab youths
who are al-Qaida’s primary recruits, ‘it’s not romantic to be cold and hungry
and hiding,’ said a senior U.S. official in South Asia.”

It’s time to declare victory and begin to get out rather than descend deeper
into an intractable civil war that we neither comprehend nor, in the end, will
care much about. Terrorists of various stripes will still exist as they have
throughout history, but the ones we are most concerned about have proved mighty
capable of relocating to less hostile environments, including sunny San Diego
and Southern Florida, where the Sept. 11 hijackers had no trouble fitting in.

There is a continued need for effective international police work to thwart
the efforts of a widely dispersed al-Qaida network, but putting resources into
that effort does not satisfy the need of the military establishment for a conventional
field of battle.

That is the significance of Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s leaked report calling
for a massive counterinsurgency campaign to make everything right about life
in Afghanistan, down to the governance of the most forlorn village. The general’s
report aims not at eliminating al-Qaida, which he concedes is barely existent
in the country, but rather at creating an Afghan society that is more to his
own liking.

It is a prescription, as the Russians and others before them learned, for war
without end. That might satisfy the marketing needs of the defense industry
and the career hopes of select military and political aspirants, but it has
nothing to do with fighting terrorism. In the end, it would seem that some of
our leaders need the Afghanistan battleground more than the terrorists do.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.