A 25-year-old college senior in Texas was denied emergency surgical care for a non-viable pregnancy — the latest example of medical providers refusing to make exceptions to the state’s total abortion ban out of fear of being criminally prosecuted.
Kelsie Norris-De La Cruz told The Washington Post that she was looking forward to the birth of her child when she discovered she was pregnant in January. However, after experiencing severe cramps and bleeding, she went to Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital, where she was told she likely had an ectopic pregnancy.
Such pregnancies, in which a fertilized egg develops in a location other than the uterine wall (typically in the fallopian tubes), are non-viable, and are responsible for between 5 to 10 percent of all pregnancy-related deaths.
Despite the life-threatening risks, Norris-De La Cruz was told that she should go back home until the pregnancy developed further, as there was a minimal chance that she could miscarry on her own or that the fertilized egg could migrate somewhere else. After about a month’s time — and after experiencing cramps so severe she could hardly stand up — Norris-De La Cruz returned to the hospital in mid-February.
There, two OB/GYNs and an on-call doctor at Arlington Memorial Hospital reviewed her case. According to medical records, the on-call doctor wanted to immediately perform surgery to rectify the situation. However, the two OB/GYNs refused to sign off on the surgery, a requirement at that hospital in order to perform the life-saving procedure.
Despite the on-call doctor stating that he did “not feel comfortable discharging her home” and that it was not “in her best interest” to leave without surgery, Norris-De La Cruz was discharged. Only after she sent images of her sonogram to a friend, who was visiting a different OB/GYN elsewhere, did a health provider finally tell her that she needed an abortion right away.
Norris-De La Cruz underwent that procedure, from a different hospital, 24 hours after being denied an abortion at Arlington Memorial Hospital. According to an OB/GYN who treated her at the second hospital, Norris-De La Cruz’s life would have been “in extreme danger” had she waited any longer.
After terminating the pregnancy that was causing her excruciating pain and threatening her life, Norris-De La Cruz expressed despair and anxiety, telling The Washington Post that she was worried over whether she could become pregnant again in the future.
“I was scared I was going to … lose my entire reproductive system if they waited too long. I knew it could happen at any moment,” she said.
Experts whom The Post consulted in reporting Norris-De La Cruz’s story said that she should have been granted an abortion right away, in compliance with Texas’s abortion law that allows the procedure if it is necessary to save a pregnant person’s life.
“That should have been a bread and butter slam dunk diagnosis. It doesn’t make sense to me that they would send her away, unless they had a fear that the surgery … could be perceived as causing an abortion” that violated Texas law, said Clayton Alfonso, an OB/GYN at Duke University who reviewed Norris-De La Cruz’s case for The Post.
However, there are dozens of examples of people in states with strict abortion bans — which supposedly make exceptions in medical emergencies — being denied life- or health-saving abortions due to medical providers’ fears that they could be punished by the state for violating the law.
Those fears are not necessarily misplaced, as evidenced by the case of Kate Cox, a woman in Texas whose fetus had Trisomy 18, a fatal condition that will result either in miscarriage or the infant dying within a few days of birth, and which can also threaten the health of the pregnant person. After doctors denied Cox an abortion, she appealed to the state courts. Ultimately, the conservative state Supreme Court said in December that she still couldn’t get an abortion, forcing Cox to flee the state in order to have the procedure.
Other cases abound of people being denied abortions in Texas in spite of clearly needing them. Early last year, five women sued the state after their pregnancies nearly killed them. One of those women, Amanda Zurawski, said that she got sepsis twice from her non-viable pregnancy, which resulted in scar tissue so severe that one of her fallopian tubes no longer functions.
“Nothing about this is pro-life,” she told NBC News at the time.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 143 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy