The Washington Post’s Wonkblog recently published a piece inspired by the American dentist who paid a lot of money to shoot Cecil the lion in Zimbabwe, asking why he – and dentists in general – make so much. Which was all pretty interesting to me, since I’ve never really thought about the economics of dental care.
But once you do focus on the issue, it turns out to have an important implication – namely that the ruling theory behind conservative notions of health reform is completely wrong.
For many years, conservatives in the United States have insisted that the problem with health costs is the fact that we don’t treat health care like an ordinary consumer good. People have insurance, which means that they don’t have the “skin in the game” necessary to incentivize them to watch costs. So what we need, the thinking goes, is “consumer-driven” health care, in which insurers no longer pay for routine expenses like visits to the doctor’s office, and in which everyone shops around for the best deals.
The usual response has been that this involves going where the money isn’t – that because health costs are dominated by big expenses that must be paid by insurers, there just isn’t much savings to be had from increasing deductibles and co-payments, for instance.
But what if even the underlying premise – that individual choice holds down costs – is all wrong?
As it turns out, substantially fewer people have dental insurance than have general medical insurance. And even when dental insurance is available, it typically leaves patients with a lot of skin in the game. But dental costs have risen just as fast as overall health spending, and it may be that the reduced role of insurers has actually raised those costs.
According to Wonkblog: “In the rest of medicine, insurers have an important function in limiting costs and promoting quality. The market power of Medicare and major national insurance companies allows them to insist on better rates for their customers when they negotiate with doctors and hospitals.”
“‘There’s been less presence from all kinds of insurance payers in the dental sector,’ explained Andy Snyder, who is in charge of oral health at the nonpartisan National Academy for State Health Policy. ‘Medicare does not cover routine dental services, and private dental coverage is far less common than private medical coverage. So, the dental industry has faced less of the cost containment and quality improvement pressures that the rest of the health care sector’s experienced over the last couple of decades.'”
So more skin in the game is not just useless, but actually counterproductive.
Defying Trump’s right-wing agenda from Day One
Inauguration Day is coming up soon, and at Truthout, we plan to defy Trump’s right-wing agenda from Day One.
Looking to the first year of Trump’s presidency, we know that the most vulnerable among us will be harmed. Militarized policing in U.S. cities and at the borders will intensify. The climate crisis will deteriorate further. The erosion of free speech has already begun, and we anticipate more attacks on journalism.
It will be a terrifying four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. But we’re not falling to despair, because we know there are reasons to believe in our collective power.
The stories we publish at Truthout are part of the antidote to creeping authoritarianism. And this year, we promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation, vitriol, hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please show your support for Truthout with a tax-deductible donation (either once today or on a monthly basis).