Last month we were told that our pass-the-popcorn moment – I mean, our long national nightmare – was finally over: Presidential candidate Donald Trump would implode now that he had dared to question Republican Senator John McCain’s heroism.
But lo and behold, he’s still hanging on to front-runner status for the Republican nomination. How is that possible?
The short answer is that the inside-the-Beltway crowd – not for the first time – confused its own perceptions with those of actual voters.
Inside the Village, Mr. McCain is a sacred figure. After all these years of being a conventional ideologue, he is still perceived as McCain the Maverick. And despite his warmongering, he’s still considered a wise man when it comes to national security, and he is a near-constant presence on the Sunday talk shows. So the villagers expected everyone to recoil in horror when Mr. Trump ridiculed Mr. McCain’s war record – you’re only supposed to do that to Democrats.
But the Republican base really doesn’t care very much. Whatever they may say, its members aren’t all that impressed by military heroism. It’s not just the treatment of John Kerry when he was running for president – think about how little Republican voters seemed to care when we killed Osama bin Laden.
And they really, really don’t care about some old guy who lost an election.
Mr. Trump surely hurt himself a bit with his recent attack on Mr. McCain, but he still embodies the base’s id in a way that the Village doesn’t seem to understand.
Trumpism
Not surprisingly, Talking Points Memo’s Rick Perlstein, our foremost expert on the rise of movement conservatism, has the best take so far on the Trump phenomenon.
As Mr. Perlstein says, nobody should be surprised to find that there are a lot of Republicans who are furious and won’t take it any more: “This is important: Conservatism is like bigotry whack-a-mole,” he wrote recently. “The quantity of hatred, best I can tell from 17 years of close study of 60 years of right-wing history, remains the same. Removing the flag of the Confederacy, raising the flag of immigrant hating: The former doesn’t spell some new Jerusalem of tolerance; the latter doesn’t mean that conservatism’s racism has finally been revealed for all to see.”
And crucially, a key part of conservative mythology is that the silent majority shares this hatred, and that it’s only the liberal elite with its political correctness that is keeping Americans from saying what they know to be true. (It’s similar to the constant trope from Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly that anyone who disagrees with him is a “far-left” type, no matter how mainstream the person’s ideas.)
So why shouldn’t the Republican base rally around “The Donald”? The elite considers him ridiculous, but the base has been told again and again that the elite is corrupt and anti-American. The base has also been told again and again that it represents the true views of everyone except Those People. So why shouldn’t its members go with someone who is their kind of guy, in style as well as substance?
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.