Rep. Mark Takano is planning to introduce a proposal that would shorten the standard work week in the U.S. to four days as the idea gains traction in Washington.
Takano, a Democrat from California, is planning to reintroduce a bill that would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to establish a standard work week that is 32 hours rather than 40, amounting to four eight-hour workdays. Hours worked past that period, unless otherwise specified, would be subject to higher compensation.
Per Semafor, Takano says the bill would help move American work standards into the future as more and more employers adopt a shorter work week or are working toward the goal.
“We have before us the opportunity to make common sense changes to work standards passed down from a different era,” Takano said in a statement. The proposal would “improve the quality of life of workers, meeting the demand for a more truncated workweek that allows room to live, play, and enjoy life more fully outside of work,” Takano continued.
The idea of a shorter work week has gained steam after a recent four-day work week pilot run by advocacy group 4 Day Week Global reported great success last month, with most of the 61 company participants saying they were planning to keep the shorter work week model in the future. The employees, whose pay was kept the same throughout the trial, reported benefits to their mental and physical health, and resignations went down during the 6-month trial period.
Takano’s bill has been endorsed by major labor unions like AFL-CIO, United Food and Commercial Workers and Service Employees International Union, as well as the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which is made up of over 100 members of Congress. Takano first introduced a version of the bill in 2021, with the support of groups like the Economic Policy Institute.
The lawmaker has said that the bill should be paired with an increase to the minimum wage and stronger worker protections in order to ensure that hourly workers could still make a liveable wage with the shorter week.
“This much stronger connection to human mortality has made people value their time,” Takano said in an interview in January 2022, speaking about the “Great Resignation” labor movement spurred by the pandemic. “I think there was a Great Realization among a lot of Americans — how hard they’re working and that they wanted to move on from the jobs that they were working at. So a four-day work week is something that connects a lot of Americans.”
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has voiced support for the idea. The senator said last week that technological advancements have allowed companies to be far more productive — but currently, corporate executives and major shareholders are the only ones reaping material benefits, with workers’ wages staying relatively stagnant despite the fact that it is their work that is boosting revenue.
“With exploding technology and increased worker productivity, it’s time to move toward a four-day work week with no loss of pay,” Sanders said. “Workers must benefit from technology, not just corporate CEOs.”
There is historical precedent for shortening the standard work week — which, of course, isn’t the universal experience of all workers, in part due to declining work standards and wages. In the 19th and 20th centuries, labor unions worked to pressure lawmakers into shortening the work day to eight hours and the work week to five days, after workers had previously been forced to work grueling hours and six- or seven-day weeks as a standard full-time job.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.