Skip to content Skip to footer

42 Democrats Vote With GOP to Sanction ICC Over Netanyahu Warrant

The bill “flies in the face of international law,” one legal scholar said.

A general view of the International Criminal Court building in The Hague, Netherlands, on April 30, 2024.

In a move that human rights groups are warning could have negative effects on the enforcement of human rights standards across the globe, the House passed a bill on Tuesday sanctioning the International Criminal Court (ICC) over its seeking of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders for their genocidal assault of Gaza.

Republicans and 42 Democrats voted in favor of the bill, which passed 247 to 155. It calls on President Joe Biden to impose sanctions on the ICC and any people involved in an ICC process of prosecuting or investigating any “protected person” of the U.S. and its allies.

The bill is unlikely to become law, with the Senate not expected to take up the bill and the Biden administration having released a Statement of Administration Policy on Monday expressing its opposition.

However, the passage of the bill is a show of how far many U.S. lawmakers are willing to go to show fealty to Israel at a time when myriad human rights experts and legal scholars have said that Israeli forces, led by Netanyahu and his far right coalition, have been perpetuating a horrific genocide in Gaza.

“Despite Israel’s transparent and ubiquitous seven-month genocidal campaign in Gaza, virtually all GOP House members and a large number of Democrats voted to sanction the International Criminal Court for considering arrest warrants against top Israeli leaders,” said Marjorie Cohn, legal scholar and former president of the National Lawyers Guild, to Truthout.

“This vote is emblematic of the enormous influence Israel has over U.S. foreign policy and flies in the face of international law,” Cohn said.

The ICC’s move to seek arrest warrants against an ally of the United States is a rare one — but one that rights groups say is urgently needed if the international community is to end Israel’s relentless slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza. Israel has had a long history of committing what experts say are grave human rights violations against Palestinians even before October, and is now perpetuating countless more atrocities in Gaza.

Human rights advocacy groups warned that the House bill has negative implications not just regarding the U.S.’s complicity in the Gaza genocide, but also international leaders’ ability to prosecute or prevent human rights violations across the world.

The American Civil Liberties Union said that the bill is written in a way that could be interpreted extremely broadly and have a “severe chilling effect on constitutionally protected speech” on those in the U.S. involved with ICC investigations — therefore potentially having a severe chilling effect on other ICC probes like the one against Russian officials in their war on Ukraine.

The bill is also a show that U.S. political leaders are willing to undermine the U.S.’s own image abroad in order to ensure that Israel can continue its genocide, groups said.

“No one is above the law, especially Netanyahu,” said pro-Palestine group Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project. “The rest of the world is repulsed by Israel’s genocide in Gaza and understands the solution is to hold war criminals like Netanyahu accountable. Our Congress is inviting Netanyahu and backing sanctions against the ICC. Shameful.”

“[A]ttacking the court through sanctions of this kind undermines the United States in its stated objective to be a global leader in securing justice for victims and legal accountability for the worst crimes,” wrote a coalition of faith-based groups in a letter to Congress opposing the bill. Signatories included the Friends Committee on National Legislation, which said that the bill would be “deeply harmful” if signed into law.

“If sanctions were applied to the ICC’s personnel, civil society in the United States and around the world would be legally unable or feel too at-risk to continue engaging with the court in any meaningful way,” the groups continued. “Human rights organizations might therefore be unable to ensure evidence of crimes by any actor are documented and available to the ICC.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy