Three mayors in the state of Missouri have filed an amicus brief in the case relating to an abortion rights ballot question that was supposed to appear before voters this November, but which a lower court judge, late last week, said had to be removed.
The brief, filed by the nonprofit civil rights organization Public Rights Project (PRP) on behalf of the mayors, urges the Missouri Supreme Court to reverse that judge’s ruling. The state’s highest court is set to hear and decide on the appeal on Tuesday, which is when ballots for the November general election are supposed to be finalized.
“The Missouri Supreme Court has the opportunity today to protect voters’ right to decide on this issue, and we’re proud to stand with local government executives from across the state to urge them to do so,” Jill Habig, founder and CEO of PRP, said in a press release statement shared with Truthout.
Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas, Columbia Mayor Barbara Buffaloe and St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones all signed on to the amicus brief. Joining them in a non-mayoral role was St. Louis County Executive Sam Page.
On Friday, state circuit court Judge Chris Limbaugh ruled that the amendment measure should be removed from the ballot for technical reasons. Although the ballot signature drive collected more than twice the signatures needed for the measure to appear on the ballot, Limbaugh found that the measure didn’t properly define what a “person’s fundamental right to reproductive freedom” is, and therefore, that it was a “blatant violation” of the constitution’s requirement to define terms clearly.
That finding is debatable, however, as the measure clearly states that it would enshrine “the right to make and carry out decisions about all matters relating to reproductive health care, including but not limited to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, birth control, abortion care, miscarriage care, and respectful birthing conditions.” The measure also specifically states that lawmakers are allowed to regulate abortions after the point of fetal viability.
Chief Judge Anthony Gabbert, an appellate level judge in the state, ruled on Saturday to expedite the appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court. The state’s highest court will hear arguments, and rule on the matter, on Tuesday.
“There is no ‘direct precedent’ — or precedent at all … for a court to strike a measure from the ballot because a secretary of state-certified ballot text was insufficient,” the amicus brief from the three mayors states, adding:
It makes little sense on this rushed posture to break that new ground. It makes even less sense to rush through a decision that would irrevocably deprive the current Missouri electorate the opportunity to vote on [the measure.]
In the press release shared with Truthout, Lucas added that Missourians should “have the right to participate in shaping laws that govern their lives.”
“But by removing the reproductive rights measure from the ballot at the eleventh hour, the lower court is silencing voters’ voices and undermining the principles of democratic self-government that this State and Country were founded upon,” Lucas went on.
It is clear, at least according to recent polling, that voters want to pass the measure.
According to a St. Louis University/YouGov poll published last month, 52 percent of residents in the state back the measure, while only 34 percent oppose it. Another 14 percent say they’re unsure.
A simple majority of support in the final vote tally is all that’s needed to enshrine the measure into the state constitution.
Missouri’s abortion “trigger” ban went into effect right after the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision, which upended abortion protections that were established by Roe v. Wade. Missouri now has a near-total abortion ban, allowing no exceptions for an abortion (including for rape or incest) except when a person’s life is at risk — a standard that many other states have included in their bans, but which in practice is rarely enforced, due to physicians’ fears that the state may not agree with what constitutes a life-or-death decision.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.