Industrial facilities produce millions of pounds of hazardous chemical waste every year and dump it directly into U.S. waterways. Environmental advocates say the government isn’t doing enough to stop them.
A coalition of 13 green groups filed a lawsuit on Tuesday arguing that the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, has violated federal law by repeatedly failing to update regulations on water pollution for seven industrial sectors. Under the Clean Water Act, the EPA is required to set limits on the amount of pollution companies can discharge based on the best available technologies, and to revise those limits every five years.
For the industrial sectors highlighted in the lawsuit, however, pollution control standards haven’t been updated for an average of 34 years.
“For decades the EPA has let these dirty industries pollute our rivers and bays instead of making them keep pace with advances in technologies that tackle water pollution,” Hannah Connor, environmental health deputy director at the nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement. “EPA needs to bring pollution standards into the 21st century.”
Among the sectors highlighted in the lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, are plastics molding, inorganic chemical production, and the manufacturing of pesticides and fertilizers. Effluent guidelines for these industries were last updated in the 1980s and ’90s, meaning companies have been allowed to dump contaminated wastewater without treating it with the most up-to-date technologies for pollution control. Organic chemical manufacturers, for example, release millions of pounds of nitrogen, benzene, and lead every year but haven’t seen updated discharge guidelines since 1993. It’s a similar situation for metal-making facilities, which released 100 million pounds of pollution into waterways in 2019. Their effluent guidelines were last updated in 1986.
Depending on the sector, there are also pollutants for which the EPA has never set any control standards — like phthalates, microplastics, and so-called “forever chemicals” from plastic-molding facilities.
The lawsuit comes about three months after the EPA published a 67-page review of its Effluent Guidelines Program. In the review, the EPA said it was taking action to control forever chemicals and pollution from slaughterhouses, but that it was “not prioritizing” updates for a number of other sectors — including those named in the environmental groups’ new lawsuit. The Environmental Integrity Project, the Center for Biological Diversity, and the other organizations said the group’s decision-making process was “fundamentally flawed.”
The EPA declined to comment on the pending litigation.
According to Jen Duggan, deputy director of the nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project, existing technologies for denitrification — widely used in municipal sewage treatment plants — could reduce some facilities’ total nitrogen discharges by up to 75 percent. She said the EPA could limit pollution from heavy metals and forever chemicals by requiring reverse osmosis and mechanical filtration technologies. “They don’t need to reinvent the wheel,” Duggan told Grist.
By failing to update pollution control standards for industrial facilities, environmental advocates say the EPA is putting people downstream at a greater risk of health problems, such as liver damage and cancer, particularly in low-income communities and communities of color that are already overburdened by other forms of industrial pollution.
“This is a story of social and ecological injustice that has perpetuated for generations,” Naomi Yoder, staff scientist for the Louisiana-based nonprofit Healthy Gulf, told reporters on Tuesday. She highlighted nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in the majority-Black districts of St. James and St. John parishes, where former slave plantations have given way to a dense concentration of oil refineries, plastic-making facilities, and other industrial activity. Every day, three of the area’s fertilizer plants dump some 13,000 pounds of nitrates each into the Mississippi River, potentially compromising drinking water supplies downstream and contributing to the deoxygenated “dead zone” that’s suffocating marine life in the Gulf of Mexico.
Duggan said it could take years for the EPA to reform its pollution control requirements, but urged swift action to keep up with an expected boom in industries like plastic manufacturing. “It’s important for the EPA to get this right,” she said. “These are not dying industries, they’re growing, and the impact is just going to get larger.”
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy