For many, water crises don’t get any more horrifying than what was initiated by city officials in Flint, Michigan when they switched the city’s water supply almost three years ago, a story we explore in the second of our ongoing comics series on water, land and housing in the state (read the first here), below. While the Flint water crisis remains a popular touchstone, a useful example to consider in light of rampant government misspending and corruption, few understand what the ongoing crises really means — or how they might identify signs of similar contamination in their own homes.
The biggest problem with Flint has always been identifying what the problem even is. The media narrative about lead levels focuses attention on contaminants more severe in 3,000 other US cities; too, the increasing evidence of bacterial infections, including deadly Legionella get ignored. Ongoing government noncompliance and backroom deals halt any progress the city could be making to limit the effects of the crisis, which makes even good news like the EPA’s $100 million grant for infrastructure improvements fall a little flat. The deeply flawed emergency management law, under which both Flint and Detroit’s crises emerged almost overnight, is still on the books. And threats to repeal the ACA [Affordable Care Act] — particularly Michigan’s expanded Medicaid program — throw into jeopardy all progress made by residents to reconstruct their health and their lives.
And yet, as in Detroit, brilliant women in Flint are leading the national conversation about water rights. Have questions about what’s really going on in Flint? Meet Melissa Mays in this month’s strip, “There’s No Way We’re Gonna Drink That.”
- Personal interview with Melissa Mays, conducted on February 21, 2017.
- “2 former Flint emergency managers charged over tainted water,” Monica Davey and Mitch Smith, The New York Times, December 20, 2016. Accessed March 1, 2017: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/20/us/flint-water-charges.html?_r=0
- “City warns of potential health risks after Flint water tests revealed too much disinfection byproduct,” Ron Fonger, MLive, January 2, 2015. Accessed February 28, 2017: https://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2015/01/flint_water_has_high_disinfect.html
- “Michigan attorney general sues France’s Veolia in Flint water crisis,” Ben Clayman, Reuters, June 22, 2016. Accessed February 28, 2017: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-michigan-water-idUSKCN0Z81PD
- “Federal judge orders delivery of bottled water in Flint,” Paul Egan, Free Press, November 10, 2016. Accessed March 1, 2017: https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2016/11/10/delivery-bottled-water-flint/93613760/
- “Soaring pneumonia deaths in Genessee County likely linked to undiagnosed Legionnaire’s, experts say,” Chastity Pratt Dawsey, Bridge, January 26, 2017. Accessed March 1, 2017: https://www.bridgemi.com/children-families/soaring-pneumonia-deaths-genesee-county-likely-linked-undiagnosed-legionnaires
- “Flint: ‘All clear’ for drinking water years away,” Jonathan Oosting, Detroit News, March 7, 2107. Accessed March 16, 2017: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2017/03/07/flint-water-conference/98862674/
Copyright Anne Elizabeth Moore and Melissa Mendes 2017.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.