After Joe Biden’s campaign Tuesday night released an online video accusing the campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders of unleashing a “barrage of negative attacks” and “not telling the truth” about the former vice president’s record on Social Security, the hashtag #TelltheTruthJoe began trending on social media and Sanders himself shot back by saying: “Let’s be honest, Joe. One of us fought for decades to cut Social Security, and one of us didn’t. But don’t take it from me. Take it from you.”
Characterizing the Biden campaign video as “the first negative ad of the 2020 Democratic primary,” Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir, in a statement, said it was important for people to understand why it was being released now.
Biden, said Shakir, is “trying to distort his decades-long record of proposing and voting for cuts to Social Security benefits for millions of people.” According to Shakir, the well-documented history shows that “Biden is no defender of Social Security, and a negative ad won’t help him outrun his record.”
To again bolster their case, the Sanders campaign released detailed fact sheet as well as a new video of their own detailing Biden’s long history of calling for Social Security cuts and espousing his willingness — across numerous decades in Congress and during his time in the White House with President Barack Obama — to work with Republicans on the effort. While Briahna Joy Gray, national press secretary for the campaign, noted early Wednesday morning the video had received over 1 million views in a matter of hours since it was released, as of this writing the figure was much closer to 2.5 million:
Let’s be honest, Joe. One of us fought for decades to cut Social Security, and one of us didn’t. But don’t take it from me. Take it from you. pic.twitter.com/qh7qb1Hmcl
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) January 22, 2020
Supporters of Sanders, including author and activist Naomi Klein, tried to make clear that the Sanders campaign video is not an attack ad against Biden but a serious effort to set the record straight about Biden’s 40-year record of being willing to freeze, trim back, or cut spending for Social Security.
“Truth time folks, on the issues,” Klein tweeted, along with the campaign video, Wednesday morning. “This is not a personal attack (so don’t even start) but the issue is damn well personal for millions of people who depend on social security to live.”
Warren Gunnels, senior policy advisor to Sanders and known as “chief of receipts,” tweeted:
Biden says he has fought to expand Social Security for his entire career? Really? What a joke.#TellTheTruthJoe #Receipts:https://t.co/UFfyHslrvzhttps://t.co/ex7ymh04wihttps://t.co/Cl9bsX651Phttps://t.co/LsP6YtvwxFhttps://t.co/hJffmAm46Qhttps://t.co/xQiZm0tweA
— Warren Gunnels (@GunnelsWarren) January 22, 2020
While New York Times columnist Paul Krugman demanded the Sanders campaign apologize for circulating a previous video highlighting Biden’s willingness to join with Republicans to cut social programs — a video which the former vice president over the weekend falsely claimed was “doctored” — Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, a non-profit group that advocates for defending and strengthening the program, shot back by saying: “The truth is that the clip is in no way doctored.”
“Indeed,” argued Altman, the full speech is worse than the selected clip, “because it includes Biden saying that Social Security ‘needs adjustments.’ That’s well known DC insider speak for ‘cut benefits.'”
His campaign’s claim that Biden was talking about “benefit expansions” when he used the term “adjustments,” said Altman, is simply not credible. “When politicians want to expand Social Security, which is extremely popular, they say so,” said Altman. “They don’t use euphemisms like ‘adjustments.'”
Biden critics — worried about the baggage he would bring to the table if wins the general election and faces off against Trump — said it is crucial that voters understand the implications of not addressing this issue during the primary:
“Expand”? “Expand”?? That’s a lie. That’s a Trump-level blatant lie. Biden has told two demonstrable whoppers about his record during this campaign – one about Iraq and the other about Social Security. He is a sitting duck for the GOP come the general election: https://t.co/KVq9OE5PKz
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) January 22, 2020
In 2013, when the Obama administration was maneuvering to reach a so-called “Grand Bargain” with Republicans that would include cuts to Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare, it was Sanders who — along with allies — staged a demonstration outside the White House denouncing such an effort.
https://twitter.com/CANCEL_SAM/status/1219826890145501186
While Altman applauded Biden for running in his current presidential campaign “on a platform of expanding, not cutting, Social Security” — calling that “both smart politics and wise policy” — she said that does not mean his past record should be off the table in this primary debate, especially as the nation’s seniors, as well as younger voters, are left facing a retirement income crisis in the years ahead.
“Biden’s past record on Social Security,” Altman said, “combined with his frequently expressed desire to work with Congressional Republicans, is still cause for concern.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.