Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Immigrant Mom Juana Villegas, Shackled During Labor, Wins Lawsuit

A federal judge in Tennessee has ruled in favor of immigrant mother Juana Villegas, who was shackled during labor and after giving birth while being held in the custody of the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office, the Tennessean recently reported. U.S. District Court Judge William Haynes Jr. will set a hearing for damages against Metro government and the sheriff’s office in Villegas’ case.

A federal judge in Tennessee has ruled in favor of immigrant mother Juana Villegas, who was shackled during labor and after giving birth while being held in the custody of the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office, the Tennessean recently reported. U.S. District Court Judge William Haynes Jr. will set a hearing for damages against Metro government and the sheriff’s office in Villegas’ case.

Villegas was nine months pregnant when, on July 3, 2008, she was arrested and charged with careless driving and driving without vehicle insurance. She also didn’t have a diver’s license. Officials then realized Villegas had a previous deportation order to her native Mexico from 1996. Davidson County, where she was arrested, participates in the controversial program 287(g), which deputizes local cops to investigate the immigration status of people they’ve arrested. In an interview with Breakthrough, Villegas’ attorney Elliot Ozmet, explains the case:

This case is first of all an immigration case. But it didn’t start out that way. It started out as a simple traffic stop — she was stopped, she was given a ticket for careless driving that still has not been explained to the to Juana. But when she was asked for her driver’s license, she was not able to produce one. The preference for law enforcement for Tennessee is to give a person without a driver’s license a citation. In this particular case the officer decided to take Juana into custody despite the fact that she was 8 1/2 months pregnant and had three children with her in the car.

The sheriff’s office cited the danger of “illegal immigrants fleeing and engaging in illegal activities” to justify shackling Villegas to the bed.

“I was in jail when my water broke,” Villegas recounted in Spanish. “They took me in an ambulance and cuffed my hands and feet. When we got to the hospital, they moved me to the bed and cuffed this hand and foot to the bed.”

Villegas delivered the baby at 1 a.m. on July 6, 2008 and was separated from her newborn son for two days. She was not allowed to have a breast pump while in her cell, and says she was in great physical pain.

Judge Haynes, however, concluded that shackling Villegas during the final stages of her labor and subsequent recovery violated her civil rights. He said there is “no empirical support of those assertions that illegal aliens as a group commit crime that endangers the public safety.”

In 2007, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released a statement supporting an end of shackling incarcerated women during birth. “Physical restraints have interfered with the ability of physicians to safely practice medicine by reducing their ability to access and evaluate the physical condition of the mother and fetus.” That same year, the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that, on average, five percent of women who enter state prisons are pregnant.

There have been nationwide efforts to get rid of shackling incarcerated women while they’re in labor. In 2009, former New York Governor David Paterson signed a bill to outlaw the practice. Former California Governor Arnold Swarzenegger vetoed a similar measure. According to the Rebecca Project for Human Rights, so far only ten states have legislation regulating the use of restraints on pregnant women.

Because of the criticism that has stemmed from her case, the sheriff’s office has changed its policy such that “pregnant women are shackled only during transport if there is a credible threat that they may try to escape.”

Villegas has won the case but faces the threat of deportation again, as the U.S. 6th District Court of Appeals has denied a request that would allow her to stay. Her lawyer, Elliott Ozmen, is pushing to stop her deportation.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy