Part of the Series
Moyers and Company
When the Supreme Court handed down its decision on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) last June 28, a handful of conservative governors were quick to declare that their states would opt out of the Medicaid expansion program. The majority of governors, however, decided to wait until after the election to make up their minds. The Kaiser Family Foundation’s Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured released an analysis yesterday — an update of a similar analysis from May 2010 — to help state politicians with that decision.
Although Obamacare will have a hefty price tag, most of the burden will be carried by the federal government. If every state accepted the Medicaid expansion, an additional 21.3 million people would be enrolled by 2022, increasing the number of Americans on Medicaid by 41 percent. In combination with other ACA provisions, it would decrease the total amount of uninsured Americans by 48 percent. States will also see an increase in Medicaid expenses, as the chart below demonstrates, over the next decade a state’s decision to opt in or out of the expansion will not significantly increase state Medicaid spending.
(The Kaiser Family Foundation)
Initially, the federal government will cover 100 percent of the cost of the Medicaid expansion. That figure drops to 95 percent in 2017 and 90 percent in 2020. The resulting decreases in federal spending add up to $8 billion that states would have to pay over the next decade, as shown in the chart above.
(The Kaiser Family Foundation)
Because increasing the number of Americans on Medicaid will decrease uncompensated care costs — as well as discounts on medical care for uninsured patients given by health care providers or state governments — some states may actually save money from the expansion. The chart to the right shows that if all states opt into the Medicaid expansion, states will save $18 billion in uncompensated care costs. That would mean that, considered together, American states would save $10 billion from the Medicaid expansion. But because each state offers different uncompensated care programs and has a different number of uninsured residents, the cost or savings on the expansion will differ from state to state. Individual states may not end up saving more than they spend.
(The Kaiser Family Foundation)
Many of the states that are likely to reduce their uninsured populations by more than 50 percent are also the states where governors are wary of the cost of the expansion and are considering opting out. But the Kaiser analysis also demonstrates that even if every state opted out of the expansion, the number of Americans on Medicaid under the ACA will still increase because other ACA-related programs (such as the health care exchange) will encourage uninsured Americans already eligible for Medicaid to enroll in the program.
For more, check out Wonkblog’s analysis of the Kaiser report, or read the report itself.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.