President Barack Obama warned Friday that the federal government will face dire budget cuts – nearly 10 percent of the nation’s defense and domestic spending – unless Congress acts later this year to reduce the $16 trillion debt.
A report that the Office of Management and Budget issued Friday says the reductions to nearly all government programs would be “deeply destructive to national security, domestic investments and core government functions.”
The automatic cuts – known inside the Beltway as sequestration – would lead to fewer FBI and Border Patrol agents, air traffic controllers and park rangers. Housing and food assistance for low-income families would be cut, and medical research would suffer. They also would delay new equipment and repairs for the military.
“For 13 months, Congress has had the opportunity to take the steps necessary to prevent the sequester from kicking in, but has failed to do so,” said Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., a member of the Senate Budget Committee. “I hope this report serves as a wake-up call.”
The report quickly became fodder on the campaign trail, where Obama and Republican rival Mitt Romney have traded barbs for months on which party is to blame for the impending cuts and escalating deficit.
Republicans and Democrats agree that the reductions would be devastating, but they disagree on what to do about them. Democrats want some cuts combined with higher taxes on the wealthy. Republicans oppose tax increases.
“With only a few months before they’re scheduled to go into effect, President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats have taken no action whatsoever to avert these cuts,” said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio said Friday in a statement. “It is neither credible nor conscionable that our commander in chief would point to his budget – which received zero votes in both the House and Senate – as a legitimate plan to stop these dangerous defense cuts.”
The cuts are the result of a bipartisan deal struck last year to raise the nation’s debt ceiling. Congress agreed that if a 12-member committee failed to reduce the deficit by $1.2 trillion over the next decade, the cuts would come from government spending. The first round is set to start in January.
In releasing the report, the Obama administration reiterated that the president has put forward his own plan, and it blamed Congress, specifically Republicans, for failing to act. Obama urged them again to do so before the end of the year.
“Republicans have, unfortunately, made clear that they would rather see cuts…than ask millionaires and billionaires to pay a single dollar more in taxes,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said. “That’s not a responsible approach. It is not a common-sense approach. It is not a balanced approach.”
Obama was required to submit a report to Congress on the proposed cuts last week. Senior administration officials said an extra week was needed to produce a thorough report.
The 400-page document details for the first time which of 1,200 programs would and would not be affected.
Most defense programs would be cut by 9.4 percent, while domestic programs would see an 8.2 percent reduction. Administration officials couldn’t say how many federal employees would lose their jobs, but they said the cuts would have a “significant impact on the federal workforce.”
The across-the-board budget cuts would hit ordinary Americans in sundry ways.
Financial assistance provided by the Office of Federal Student Aid would fall by $140 million. A program that the Department of Health and Human Services administers to provide heating assistance to low-income families would be slashed by $285 million.
Children and family services programs run by HHS would lose $812 million. The Agricultural Disaster Relief Fund, which was in the news during the brutal summer drought, stands to lose $104 million in funding.
Other important functions of government also would be affected.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would see funding fall by $464 million; the National Institutes of Health, $2.5 billion; the Transportation Security Administration, $429 million for airport security measures. And the list would go on and on.
Obama officials say that the law – not the administration — dictates which items would be affected. Certain programs, such as veterans’ benefits and food stamps, would be exempt. Medicare benefits are also exempt, but Medicare providers would take a 2 percent hit.
On Friday, groups that the cuts would affect began lobbying Congress – again – to prevent them.
“Congress must take action to avert these cuts and protect our nation’s ability to prevent and save lives from cancer,” said Christopher W. Hansen, the president of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network.
Congress in on track to pass a bill to finance government spending through March, but it doesn’t plan to address the issue of cuts until after the elections
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.