In a debate with Hillary Clinton in January 2008, now-President Barack Obama said about ending the war in Iraq:
I will offer a clear contrast as somebody who never supported this war, thought it was a bad idea. I don’t want to just end the war, but I want to end the mindset that got us into war in the first place.
That’s the kind of leadership I’m going to provide as president of the United States.
President Obama did end the Iraq war. But ending the mindset that got us into war remains a work in progress.
We continue to experience near-misses. We were hours away from bombing Syria when Obama relented to pressure to seek Congressional authorization – and then, facing near-certain defeat on an authorization of force vote, chose diplomacy instead. More recently, a majority of senators sponsored a bill designed to blow up US diplomacy with Iran, threatening to put us on a path to war, before public and presidential pressure forced these senators to back down.
In his State of the Union address tonight, Obama has a very straightforward opportunity to help end the mindset that got us into war, by talking about the necessity of providing the funding to care for the veterans from a decade of war.
Part of the mindset that got us into war was that we underestimated the cost of war by not considering the future cost of caring for veterans. If we want to avoid that mistake in the future, we should resist the temptation to look away from the cost now. Part of changing the mindset that leads to war is accepting that starting a war means undertaking a lifetime commitment to the people who serve in it. If marriage is a big deal, war is a bigger deal. We can never divorce a war. We can end a war, but we’ll never stop paying for it during the lifetimes of the war’s veterans.
Obama has the bully pulpit tonight, and he can start the conversation. Stars and Stripes reports:
Veterans groups said they want more than just a mention. At the top of their list is the recent budget deal that included a 1 percent reduction in annual military retirement cost-of-living adjustments for working-age veterans, a move that will cost some career servicemembers tens of thousands of dollars in future income.
But the White House has been mum on the issue, offering only support for the overall budget deal and the fiscal stability it provides to all military programs.
“This would be a great opportunity for their perspective on the issue,” said Alexander Nicholson, legislative director for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. “It’s the perfect platform to draw attention to the problem.”
He noted than in 2010, the president made just a brief mention of repealing the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law in the annual address, but the prominence of the speech instantly elevated the importance of the issue. Congress voted to abolish the law 11 months later.
“Even just a mention in the State of the Union can shift priorities,” he said.
IAVA leaders also hope the president will address advance funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs, the veterans claims backlog, improvements to the GI Bill and military suicide prevention.
None of those issues have grabbed national headlines recently, and it would be surprising for them to get more than a brief mention in the speech.
It’s true that these issues haven’t “grabbled national headlines recently.” But that could very easily change, because these issues have a vehicle – Sen. Bernie Sanders’ veterans’ benefits bill – and that bill will grab national headlines as soon as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid calls it for a vote. Sanders’ bill links the broader veterans’ agenda to the military pension fix, and that means that holding a vote on the bill definitely grab would national headlines for these issues. Consider how votes in the Senate on extending unemployment insurance have grabbed national headlines: That will happen for the veterans’ agenda if Reid calls a vote on the Sanders bill.
The Sanders bill is widely supported by veterans organizations, including the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. AFL-CIO officials say that the Sanders veterans’ benefits bill also is supported by the AFL-CIO.
The Brattleboro Reformer reported last week that Sanders, a Vermont independent, said that Reid had indicated to him that he would like the vote on the bill to occur as soon as possible, which may be as soon as this week.
Sanders has said that he expects to have support from the entire Senate Democratic caucus and hopes to have Republican support as well, because many of the bill’s provisions originally were proposed by Republicans.
Whether Senate Republicans support it or not, a Senate vote is a national news story. If enough Republicans support it, the story is that the Senate passed the bill. If too many Republicans oppose, the story is that Senate Republicans are blocking the veterans’ agenda. President Obama states his support for the Sanders bill, that’s going to put it near the top of the Senate’s to-do list.
All that needs to happen now is a little more public clamor for doing right by our veterans. You can add to the public clamor here.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.