The issue of poverty is rarely brought up willingly by politicians. In speech after speech, they make constant appeals to “the middle class,” whether by promising to cut taxes, bring back jobs or any of a number of different promises. In fact, listening to most politicians, you might think that being a member of “the middle class” is as bad as it gets in the US. Unfortunately, the situation is much bleaker than that.
As of 2015, the number of Americans living in poverty was around 45.7 million people, or 14.3 percent of the total population. In the United States, the richest country on Earth, these numbers are shocking and inexcusable.
Policymakers and academics sometimes struggle to explain how to fix the crisis of poverty in the US, but one important solution is more obvious than you might think. If the problem of poverty is a problem of people not having enough money, one easy way to fix it is to simply give people money. This is the central idea of a universal basic income (UBI), a policy that is getting the attention of an increasing number of policymakers and journalists.
A UBI is a policy by which the government pays every citizen a certain amount of money every month with no strings attached. Unlike most other welfare policies, there is no work requirement and no means test. UBI has been getting a lot of attention in recent years both as a means to eliminate poverty and as a necessary safety net for the impending automation of a huge number of jobs in the US.
Unlike many other anti-poverty programs, which focus on the importance of work and increased wages as their primary tools, UBI is given to all Americans, regardless of their work status. This is critical to its effectiveness as an anti-poverty tool, because 60-65 percent of those in poverty are children, elderly, disabled or students. These people do not benefit from any poverty program that focuses on jobs because they simply are unable to work. UBI has the power to lift these people out of poverty and give them the means to provide for their needs. In fact, even a modest UBI of about $3,000 a year would cut the poverty rate in the US in half.
UBI has other benefits too. It would increase the bargaining power of labor relative to capital, provide an income for people transitioning between jobs and give people the means to pursue their passions without worrying about money. UBI has received praise from many sides of the political spectrum, from progressives like Robert Reich, to libertarians like Charles Murray, to Marxists like Erik Olin Wright.
A UBI could be paid for in a variety of ways, such as raising taxes on the rich and eliminating corporate subsidies, or alternatively, by paying out dividends from common public assets such as natural resources and the financial and telecommunications infrastructure.
The latter proposal characterizes the Alaska Permanent Fund, a program in the state of Alaska that has been distributing a basic income for decades. The Alaska Permanent Fund pays a certain amount of money ($2,072 in 2015) to every Alaska resident each year. The funds for this basic income scheme are drawn from royalties paid to the state government for drilling for oil on public land. Although progressives and leftists oppose expanded oil drilling, the basic funding structure of the Alaska Permanent Fund could be applied to a variety of different funding sources, such as a carbon tax paid by polluters. The Alaska example, in addition to showing the economic viability of UBI, also demonstrates its political viability. In some sense, UBI is the ultimate “entitlement program.” Yet, in the deep red Republican state of Alaska, it enjoys widespread public support. This is likely in large part due to the fact that, similar to other popular programs such as Social Security and Medicare, a UBI is paid out to everyone, not just a narrow group of citizens determined by a means test.
It is clear that UBI is both an effective and politically viable tool to reduce and possibly eliminate poverty. The only thing standing in the way is political will. Therefore, in the discussion of how to help the millions of Americans struggling to pay for their basic needs, a universal basic income should be at the top of every policymaker and activist’s list.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.