Skip to content Skip to footer

Two Anti-Trans Laws Blocked by Federal Judges in Arkansas and West Virginia

The laws attacked gender-affirming care for trans youth and imposed restrictions on sports for trans athletes.

Two federal judges made separate rulings on Wednesday blocking restrictions that Republican lawmakers had put in place regarding trans youth’s access to health care and their participation in sports.

In Arkansas, a law that would have banned gender-affirming care for transgender children in the state was halted by federal Judge James M. Moody Jr., who issued a preliminary injunction against it until a full ruling on its legality can be assessed. The law was set to be enforced later this month.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), representing four transgender children in the state that would have been negatively impacted by the statute, as well as two doctors that provide such care, filed a lawsuit against the law earlier this year. In response to the ruling from Moody, Republican state Attorney General Leslie Rutledge claimed the ACLU was using children from Arkansas “as pawns for their own social agenda.”

But in a statement praising Moody’s injunction, the ACLU of Arkansas pointed out that this type of care was critical for transgender children.

“This ruling sends a clear message to states across the country that gender affirming care is life-saving care, and we won’t let politicians in Arkansas — or anywhere else — take it away,” said Holly Dickson, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas.

In its lawsuit, the ACLU had argued that the law would prevent transgender children from being able “to obtain medical care that their doctors and parents agree they need.” Denying this care, lawyers for the organization said, as well as interrupting gender-affirming treatment for children already receiving it, “could have serious and potentially life-threatening consequences.”

Moody agreed with those arguments in his ruling. “To pull this care midstream from these patients, or minors, would cause irreparable harm,” he wrote.

On the same day, a ruling in West Virginia also temporarily halted a ban that would have prevented transgender students from participating in sports on teams corresponding to their gender identities. Federal Judge Joseph R. Goodwin blocked a statute in that state passed earlier this year, placing a preliminary injunction on its enforcement while he considers more evidence from the case.

The block allows an 11-year-old transgender student who had sued the state over the law to take part in try-outs for her school’s sports.

“I am excited to know that I will be able to try out for the girls cross-country team and follow in the running shoes of my family,” Becky Pepper-Jackson, the student who filed the lawsuit over the law, said in a statement, as reported by Politico. “It hurt that the State of West Virginia would try to block me from pursuing my dreams. I just want to play.”

In his decision, Goodwin said there was “scant evidence that this law addresses any problem at all, let alone an important one.” The federal judge also said that the suit against the West Virginia statute has a “likelihood of success” in proving that it’s unconstitutional, citing Title IX protections that exist for children participating in school-based sports across the country.

The legal argument follows what the Department of Education asserted last month, when Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said that statutes which exclude transgender students from school activities were clear violations of federal law.

“Students cannot be discriminated against because of their sexual orientation or their gender identity,” Cardona said in June, adding that protections upheld by the Supreme Court for LGBTQ individuals in the workplace existed for schoolchildren as well.

Several more challenges to discriminatory laws are likely to make their way through the courts in the near future, due to the soaring numbers of anti-trans proposals introduced in GOP-led state legislatures across the country, some of which have already passed into law. Since the start of the year, at least 33 states have seen the introduction of more than 100 pieces of legislation designed to restrict the rights of transgender students.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy