While speaking to reporters on Thursday afternoon, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany insisted that schools should reopen across the country this fall, even as coronavirus rates continue to spike to record highs in several U.S. states.
McEnany’s statements appeared to endorse a return to school for students in spite of what science has to say. But she also contradicted herself in later statements, arguing that science supported the administration’s views.
“The president has said unmistakably that he wants schools to open,” McEnany said. “And when he says open, he means open in full, kids being able to attend each and every day at their school.”
“The science should not stand in the way of this,” she added, suggesting that schools should reopen even if studies demonstrate it’s unsafe to do so.
Later on in the same press briefing, however, McEnany explained that, in her mind, reopening schools was an idea that was backed up by science.
“The science is very clear on this,” McEnany said, citing a study that she claimed showed the “risk of critical illness from COVID is far less for children than that of seasonal flu.”
Numbers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in late June, however, say otherwise, demonstrating that death rates for children from coronavirus were higher than estimates for how many kids died from the flu this year. Indeed, among children 5-17 years old, COVID-19 is around three times more deadlier than the flu, according to the CDC’s figures.
While children do appear to be at a lower risk for contracting COVID-19, it’s not impossible for them to do so, and to possibly suffer other medical ailments (beyond those specifically associated with the disease) as a result.
The CDC itself has a list of recommendations for reopening schools in a safer way, including requiring masks for most students, keeping distance between students in classrooms and in hallways, and transportation suggestions such as having kids occupy every-other seat on a bus.
Those ideas were lambasted, however, by President Donald Trump in a tweet earlier this month. The president described them as too “impractical,” as well as too “tough & expensive” for districts to handle.
According to the CDC website, the recommendations they listed are just that — suggestions for districts to consider. “These considerations are meant to supplement — not replace — any state, local, territorial, or tribal health and safety laws, rules, and regulations with which schools must comply,” the agency wrote on its website, implying that it’s also acceptable for school districts to determine for themselves whether it’s safe or not to reopen.
Polling on the issue of reopening schools finds that a majority of Americans are against doing so. Just 38 percent of respondents in a Politico/Morning Consult poll released this week said they were supportive of kids returning to classrooms in the fall, while 53 percent said they were opposed to the idea.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.