Democratic lawmakers and rights advocates voiced outrage and contempt overnight in response to a new five-page memo from the Justice Department sanctioned by President Donald Trump late Wednesday that would restrict federal funding to U.S. cities determined by Attorney General William Barr to be so-called “anarchist jurisdictions” — a term that made clear to critics the move is nothing short of an election-year canard designed to bolster the president’s “law and order” campaign message.
According to the Washington Post’s Jeff Stein — who characterized the move as an “extraordinary attack on political opponents just months ahead of the 2020 election” by Trump — the DOJ memo “directs the White House Office of Management and Budget [OMB] to give guidance to federal agencies on restricting funding to cities that ‘defund’ their police departments. The memo also directs the Justice Department within 14 days to come up with a list of localities that qualify as ‘anarchist jurisdictions’ and post that list publicly.”
While Black Lives Matter protesters and others have called for “defunding” police departments in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd and other victims this year, there has been little political purchase for the demand — which polls have shown remains largely unpopular — among most Democratic lawmakers. Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has adamantly opposed cutting budgets as part of the solution to otherwise much-needed police and criminal justice reforms.
As Stein reports:
The memo comes as the president seeks to intensify his attacks on Democratic mayors of cities that have faced civil unrest amid protests against police brutality. It specifically calls for a review of federal funding that goes to Portland, Ore.; New York City; Seattle; and D.C. Legal experts said the White House maneuver to restrict funding would almost certainly be met by an immediate challenge in court.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, was gobsmacked over the latest threat by the president — especially as it arrived directly through the Justice Department.
Gupta cited the DOJ’s memo — which broadly defines “anarchist jurisdictions” as an area “that unreasonably refuses to accept offers of law enforcement assistance by the federal government” or “any other related factors the Attorney General deems appropriate” — to express disbelief.
“This is actually happening. On our watch,” Gupta said. “I can’t imagine what four more years of Trump-Barr would mean for our democracy.”
DOJ’s definition of “anarchist jurisdictions” includes “any other related factors the Attorney General deems appropriate”
This is actually happening. On our watch. I can’t imagine what four more years of Trump-Barr would mean for our democracy. https://t.co/jDmgNmSC4Z
— Vanita Gupta (@vanitaguptaCR) September 3, 2020
Sam Berger, a former senior OMB official during the Obama administration, told the Post that legal action would be nearly certain if and when Trump follows through with the memo’s threat and said: “This is a campaign document coming out of the White House.”
Mayor Ted Wheeler of Portland, Oregon — who has clashed repeatedly with Trump — warned that the withdrawal of federal funds could possibly include money for “health, education and safety net dollars Americans need to get through the pandemic and economic crisis.”
Trump threatens to withdraw federal funds, possibly including health, education and safety net dollars Americans need to get through the pandemic and economic crisis. Again, he targets cities – including ours – with democratic Mayors, which he calls “anarchist jurisdictions.”
— Mayor Ted Wheeler (@tedwheeler) September 3, 2020
“This is a new low, even for this president,” said Wheeler in a statement late Wednesday. “He continues to believe that disenfranchising people living in this country to advance his petty grudges is an effective political strategy. The rest of us know it is dangerous, destructive, and divisive.”
Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York denounced the DOJ memo and the president’s support for it. “We will not allow President Trump’s malicious infantile ways to hurt New York City,” Schumer tweeted. “Instead of these foolish stunts he ought to be focused on getting our country out of the COVID crisis.”
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo delivered a similar message:
President Trump has actively sought to punish NYC since day one.
He let COVID ambush New York.
He refuses to provide funds that states and cities MUST receive to recover.
He is not a king. He cannot “defund” NYC.
It’s an illegal stunt.
— Andrew Cuomo (@NYGovCuomo) September 2, 2020
Katie Phang, a legal analyst for NBC News, was among those who noted: “It’s not ‘anarchists’ that will be hurt by this power grab; it’s the residents.”
And Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director of counsel for the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund, said in response to the DOJ order: “Ironically the one instance in which the federal government is actually required to withhold fed funds from local programs is missing. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which should prohibit federal funding to police departments engaged in racial discrimination.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.