A heated exchange between members of the Trump administration and medical experts on the coronavirus task force erupted at the White House’s Situation Room on Saturday over the efficacy of a drug President Donald Trump has called a “game-changer” in the fight against coronavirus, despite the lack of research supporting its use.
The spat between differing factions remained unresolved on Sunday, as Trump interrupted a question directed to Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top immunologist expert and member of the coronavirus task force.
Noting that Fauci has been a frequent skeptic in the use of hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug, for treating coronavirus, reporters asked him to voice his opinion once again on Sunday during a White House press briefing. Trump intervened before Fauci could reply.
“He’s answered that question 15 times,” Trump said in response.
Trump has, at various points over the past few weeks, pushed hydroxychloroquine for use in combating symptoms or possibly even treatment of COVID-19 for patients afflicted with the disease across the country. Yet not everyone agrees with the president’s assessment — Fauci included.
Fauci’s opposition to the drug led to a confrontation with Trump’s top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, the day before the press briefing where Trump interrupted him.
In a scene described through reporting from Axios, discussion of the drug was brought about in the Situation Room on Saturday, when Navarro dropped stacks of folders on the table at the meeting, saying they contained information that proved hydroxychloroquine was effective in treating coronavirus.
“The first words out of his mouth are that the studies that he’s seen, I believe they’re mostly overseas, show ‘clear therapeutic efficacy.’ Those are the exact words out of his mouth,” according to a source quoted by Axios.
Fauci disagreed, arguing that the drug needed further testing before it could be considered an effective treatment option. Navarro’s documents were anecdotal, he said, which reportedly “set Peter off,” another source told Axios.
Navarro launched into a tirade, according to those familiar with the back-and-forth, and even accused Fauci of being against the president on a number of issues, including closing travel from China — an accusation that likely confused many in the room because Fauci was, in fact, an early supporter of the president’s actions on travel restrictions.
On Monday morning, Navarro seemed to acknowledge the spat on CNN’s “New Day” program. When asked why he believed he could go toe-to-toe on medical matters with Fauci, Navarro responded, “Doctors disagree about things all the time.”
Navarro is not a medical doctor, but has a Ph.D. in economics.
Navarro, an economist who isn’t even respected in his own field, claims we should listen to his medical advice because he has a social science PhD. I have a social science PhD. If I ever tell you what medicines to take, forcibly admit me to an institution. pic.twitter.com/4Pol6Gojzq
— Brian Klaas (@brianklaas) April 6, 2020
“My qualifications, in terms of looking at the science, is that I’m a social scientist. I have a Ph.D.,” Navarro said in the interview. “And I understand how to read statistical studies, whether it’s in medicine, the law, economics or whatever.”
Navarro’s ethics, however, have been questioned in the past, even as a scientist in his own field of study. A number of books he has authored, for instance, contained statements from a purported economist named Ron Vara — an individual, it was later revealed, that Navarro had crafted from his own imagination.
In spite of Navarro’s spirited defense of Trump promoting hydroxychloroquine without any evidence of it being an effective treatment for COVID-19, there have been unintended consequences of the president doing so. For instance, with a sizable number of Americans believing his statements, there has been documented hoarding of pills that have caused shortages across the nation, affecting the lives and comfort of many who actually need it for other reasons.
There is also the possibility of people trying to use the drug or variations of it with deadly consequences. One married couple from Arizona, for example, ingested a chemical compound containing chloroquine last month, believing Trump’s claims that it would prevent them from contracting the novel coronavirus. Both ended up hospitalized, and the husband died.
I can’t take it anymore. I’ve been to The Hague. I’m making a referral for crimes against humanity tomorrow. Today’s press conference was the last straw. I know the need for a prosecution referral when I see one. https://t.co/XQin24gqY4
— Summit County Clerk of Courts Tavia Galonski (@ClerkGalonski) April 6, 2020
Trump’s continued insistence that hydroxychloroquine is something Americans ought to consider has caused one state lawmaker from Ohio to suggest Trump should be charged criminally.
After hearing him again on Sunday promote the drug, Ohio state Rep. Tavia Galonski, a Democrat, tweeted out that she would be “making a referral for crimes against humanity” on Monday.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.