President Donald Trump shared a tweet on Sunday that suggested he might be thinking about removing Anthony Fauci from the coronavirus task force, or possibly from his position within the National Institutes of Health, over his comments from this past weekend in which the doctor stated that an earlier implementation of mitigation efforts could have saved lives.
The tweet that the president shared came from a former candidate for Congress who had once sought the seat held by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. The tweet itself made some questionable assumptions of Fauci’s past statements.
On Sunday, Fauci, in an interview with Jake Tapper on CNN, stated that, had the process for attempting to prepare for the spread of the coronavirus in the U.S. started sooner, such efforts could have resulted in a smaller number of Americans dying.
“Obviously you can logically say if you had a process that was ongoing and you started mitigation earlier you could have saved lives,” Fauci said during the interview. “Obviously no one is going to deny that.”
Fauci did not directly fault the president in his comments. However, many on social media appeared to interpret it that way, including former congressional candidate DeAnna Lorraine, who wrote a tweet saying, among other things, that Fauci should be fired.
“Fauci is now saying that had Trump listened to the medical experts earlier he could’ve saved more lives,” Lorraine wrote. “Fauci was telling people on February 29th that there was nothing to worry about and it posed no threat to the US public at large.”
“Time to #FireFauci…” Lorraine added.
Trump shared Lorraine’s tweet with his own comment which described the idea that his administration could have acted earlier to contain the spread of coronavirus as “fake news.”
Sorry Fake News, it’s all on tape. I banned China long before people spoke up. Thank you @OANN https://t.co/d40JQkUZg5
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 12, 2020
Trump didn’t call for Fauci’s ouster in his tweet like Lorraine did, but citing her tweet without directly contradicting it raises questions about where he stands on the matter.
However, Lorraine’s reasoning contains questionable characterizations of Fauci’s statements.
Lorraine hinted, for example, that Fauci was behaving just like Trump and others in his administration on February 29 — acting as if the virus posed no serious threat. In fact, Fauci was voicing some concern about the novel coronavirus at the time.
Four days earlier, on February 25, Fauci wasn’t yet advocating for social distancing measures, but he was telling the nation to ready itself for potential changes to daily life.
“You don’t need to do anything different today than you did yesterday, but the thing we need to do is to be understanding what we would have to do if we did see community spread here,” Fauci said at the time.
He also suggested, at that moment, that it was time to get prepared for the disease. “Right now it is under control, but that doesn’t mean you can let your guard down and think that it’s nothing to be concerned about,” he said.
On February 29, Fauci reiterated those comments during an interview on NBC’s “Today” show. He stressed that there weren’t any actions Americans needed to take on that day, but that didn’t mean something couldn’t change in the immediate future.
“Right now, at this moment, there is no need to change anything that you’re doing on a day by day basis. Right now, the risk is low, but that could change … when you start to see community spread, this could change,” Fauci said.
To say that Fauci was stating coronavirus “posed no threat” to the country, as Lorraine did in her tweet, is a misleading characterization of what the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases was actually telling the country at the end of February — a characterization that, it appears to some, the president may be considering as reason to fire Fauci.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy