Donald Trump’s pick for Secretary of State hit out at the Muslim Brotherhood in the opening statement that he delivered on Wednesday to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
At the onset of his confirmation hearing, Rex Tillerson called the group “an agent for radical Islam like al-Qaeda…and certain elements within Iran.”
The assessment raises the possibility that the Trump administration will not eschew the sort of Islamophobia and authoritarianism that Trump himself promoted during the presidential campaign.
Republican advisers and lawmakers have, in recent years, pushed bizarre theories about the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood, calling, at times, for crackdowns on the organization, modeled after dictatorial governments abroad.
In Feb. 2016, for example, Republicans on the House Foreign Affairs Committee approved of legislation that would have forced the State Department to label the Brotherhood a terrorist organization.
In a report on the proposal, GOP lawmakers positively cited the Syrian government’s decision in 1980 to ban the Brotherhood–a decree that preceded the massacre of tens of thousands of civilians in Hama. The document also praised anti-Brotherhood decrees by the Egyptian, Saudi Arabian and Bahraini governments.
“I fear that this bill appeals to our base fears,” John Conyers (D-Mich.), the committee’s ranking Democrat said, at the time, of the measure. “Islamophobia may be good politics — time will tell — but it certainly is not good policy.”
Conyers noted then that the Brotherhood has, since the 1950’s, been “predominately a non-violent religious political and social service organization.” Neither Hillary Clinton nor John Kerry mentioned the group in opening statements delivered during their confirmation hearings.
The Muslim Brotherhood has also featured in unfounded theories peddled by high-ranking Republican campaign advisers.
The chief of staff for Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, for example, promoted claims about Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin being a secret member of the group. The assistant, who is also Flynn’s son, resigned from the Trump transition team in December, when his unsubstantiated views received increased media scrutiny.
The same tale about Abedin had been promoted by Frank Gaffney, an adviser on the 2016 presidential campaign of Ted Cruz (R-Texas). Gaffney was the center of attention on the campaign trail, during the primary, after Cruz called for the policing of “Muslim neighborhoods.”
The appeal came from Cruz months after the front-running Trump raised eyebrows by floating the idea of banning all Muslims from entering the US.
Democratic lawmakers, too, have been the target of malicious criticism about the Brotherhood, from other figures who are welcomed by Republican lawmakers with open arms.
Chris Gaubatz, a witness at a hearing chaired last summer by Cruz, accused Reps. Andre Carson (D-Ind.) and Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) of having Brotherhood ties. The two lawmakers are the only Muslims in Congress.
On the global stage, in recent years the Muslim Brotherhood has featured most prominently in Egypt, a close US ally. The country’s only democratically-elected president in history, Muhammed Morsi, was the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood leader. In 2013, Morsi was overthrown in a military coup.
Wednesday’s confirmation hearing has been heavily anticipated, with Tillerson having limited foreign policy experience and no public sector service under his belt. Before being selected by Trump to be America’s next chief envoy, he was the CEO of oil conglomerate Exxon-Mobil, and has spent decades working for the dirty energy producer.
Before assuming public office, the former oilman will first have to convince Republicans he is fit for the job. If all Democrats vote against the nomination, Tillerson can only afford two Republican defections.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is one GOP senator who might reject Trump’s nominee. At Wednesday’s hearing, Rubio aggressively questioned Trump’s choice, pressing Tillerson to give his views on the Russian government and on reports of Russian war crimes in Syria.
The former executive’s industry ties to Moscow have been fodder for much criticism on Capitol Hill, amid allegations surrounding the Russian government and the election year hack of the Democratic National Committee.
US intelligence agencies have said that the exfiltration of DNC emails was ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin to benefit Trump. They have not yet produced forensic evidence to back up this claim. Last week, however, the Director of National Intelligence released an unclassified version of a mutli-agency report that outlined some of the reasoning behind the allegations.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.