Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Organization Hit With Maximum Fine of $1.6 Million for Tax Evasion Scheme

Though the fine amounts to pocket change for the company, the reputational hit from the 17 felonies could be ruinous.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks at a press conference after the sentencing hearing of the Trump Organization at the New York Supreme Court on January 13, 2023, in New York City.

Former President Donald Trump’s company was handed a $1.6 million fine by a judge on Friday as a result of the 17 convicted felonies committed by the Trump Organization as part of its 15-year tax fraud scheme — the maximum penalty that can be handed down for such a crime in New York, but one that amounts to pocket change for the multibillion dollar company.

A New York State Supreme Court judge handed down the sentence on Friday, capping a years-long investigation into the Trump Organization that ultimately found the company guilty of felony tax fraud for hiding high-end benefits to executives from the government, among other charges. Former Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg, who helped orchestrate the scheme, was sentenced to five months in prison earlier this week after pleading guilty.

Though the sentence is a stain on Trump’s purported image as a savvy businessmaker, it is little more than that for the organization, as $1.6 million represents less than even the hidden compensation given to some individual executives, and less than the $2 million that Weisselberg himself has paid in taxes and penalties under his plea agreement — which he has already recouped in part in his $640,000 salary and $500,000 holiday bonus from the company.

In fact, the penalty is likely far less than the amount that the Trump Organization “saved” by perpetuating the scheme. Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass said in his closing argument against the company last month that the company would have paid $3.5 million more in taxes if it had properly reported Weisselberg’s compensation between 2005 and 2017.

Prosecutors in the case noted that the penalty is low for the organization and called for reforms to New York law that could actually deter companies from participating in similar schemes in the future. As it is, $1.6 million is enough that large corporations could essentially account for committing such crimes in their operating budgets.

Steinglass acknowledged the fine will have a “minimal impact” on the company while asking the judge for the maximum punishment. “The only way to effectively deter such conduct is to make it as expensive as possible,” he said.

New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg emphasized the need for reform outside of the courtroom on Friday. “I want to be very clear: we don’t think that is enough. Our laws in this state need to change in order to capture this type of decade-plus systemic, egregious fraud,” Bragg said.

Some experts say that the hit to the Trump Organization’s reputation and future business prospects will be the most impactful result of the sentencing, rather than the financial penalty.

“It spells doom for the Trump Organization —I really see it as a death knell,” Bennett Gershman, Pace University law school and former New York State anti-corruption prosecutor, told CBS earlier this week.

The conviction will make it extremely difficult for the company to obtain loans in the future, Gershman went on. “It would be implausible for any responsible lending institution, bank, insurance company or institutions that provide financial support for companies to have anything to do with the Trump Organization now,” he said.

Though Trump himself won’t face direct penalties for the conviction, the hit to his company’s reputation could be extremely costly for him, and the felonies could potentially be used as evidence by prosecutors in other cases against him. Indeed, Trump is facing fraud charges in New York Attorney General Letitia James’s lawsuit against him, currently pending, which accuses the former president and the Trump Organization of fraudulently overvaluing assets and lying to lenders to get better loan terms and avoid taxes.

Briefly, we wanted to update you on where Truthout stands this month.

To be brutally honest, Truthout is behind on our fundraising goals for the year. There are a lot of reasons why. We’re dealing with broad trends in our industry, trends that have led publications like Vice, BuzzFeed, and National Geographic to make painful cuts. Everyone is feeling the squeeze of inflation. And despite its lasting importance, news readership is declining.

To ensure we stay out of the red by the end of the year, we have a long way to go. Our future is threatened.

We’ve stayed online over two decades thanks to the support of our readers. Because you believe in the power of our work, share our transformative stories, and give to keep us going strong, we know we can make it through this tough moment.

We’ve launched a campaign to raise $44,000 in the next 7 days. Please consider making a donation today.