The head of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) national security division, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, is stepping down from his post. The action comes amid revelations that during the Trump era, the department had subpoenaed phone records of Democratic lawmakers whom the former chief executive frequently castigated in public statements.
John Demers, who serves as assistant attorney general of the National Security Division at the Justice Department, announced on Monday that he will be resigning from his position effective next week.
Demers is not believed to have been involved personally with the start of an investigation by the Trump administration to determine who was leaking information to the media, as he was confirmed to his position after those subpoenas were issued.
Those subpoenas, which involved the seizure of phone records and data from Apple, affected at least two lawmakers, Democratic Representatives Eric Swalwell and Adam Schiff, both of California, as well as members of their family, including a child. Reporters from The Washington Post, CNN and The New York Times also had their phone records subpoenaed as part of the inquiry.
Trump frequently clashed with both Swalwell and Schiff, and vociferously objected to reports from those media organizations as “fake news” or other similarly pejorative terms.
Even though Demers wasn’t initially involved with the investigation, it’s likely he was briefed about the matter. In spite of the timing of his announced departure, an official within the DOJ said that Demers’s decision to resign was not related to the controversy, and was purportedly planned before reports about the subpoenas were made public late last week.
What Demers and others within the department knew about the subpoenas against Democratic lawmakers and members of the media will likely come under scrutiny by the pending investigations. The House Judiciary Committee plans to delve into why the subpoenas were issued, with the goal of determining whether they were politically motivated.
“Recent reports suggest that, during the Trump Administration, the Department of Justice used criminal investigations as a pretext to spy on President Trump’s perceived political enemies,” committee chair Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-New York) recently said.
In addition to the committee’s inquiry, the Justice Department’s inspector general also plans to investigate the subpoenas.
Trump’s DOJ in 2017 and 2018 obtained the phone data during the tenure of Attorney General Jeff Sessions. The inquiry was eventually dropped but revived when former Attorney General William Barr took over the department. No evidence of malfeasance on the part of lawmakers or news organizations was ever uncovered.
Many DOJ officials viewed the investigation as having a political bent, rather than a legitimate concern over who was leaking information to the press. Officials who previously worked in the Justice Department have also opined that the investigations appear to be based on politics.
“In combination with former President Trump’s unmistakable vendetta against Congressman Schiff, it raises serious questions about whether the manner in which this investigation was conducted was influenced by political considerations rather than purely legal ones,” former DOJ official David Laufman said, speaking to The New York Times about the matter.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.