From March of last year through May 2021, those who didn’t ever wear masks to stop the spread of coronavirus were two times more likely to get infected with the virus than those who wore their masks whenever they ventured outside their home, data from a new study suggests.
The Axios/Ipsos Coronavirus Index polled people about their mask-wearing and other habits associated with the COVID-19 pandemic over the past year along with questions about how they tested for the infection. Of those respondents who said they always wore their masks in public, only 11 percent said they ended up testing positive for the virus, compared to nearly a quarter (23 percent) of respondents who said they never wore masks and eventually contracted coronavirus.
The gap may be even wider than that because according to Axios, those who didn’t wear masks were also less likely to get tested for the virus. “When a group of people is getting tested less often than others, but has a higher positive rate, there’s a good chance that there are other sick people who are being missed,” the news site noted.
There was an even more pronounced difference between those who practiced social distancing standards — staying six feet apart from people with whom they did not share living quarters — and those who rejected them. Among the former, only 10 percent of those who adhered to distancing rules all of the time ended up contracting coronavirus, whereas 26 percent of those who ignored social distancing ended up testing positive for COVID-19.
The findings from the survey demonstrate that while masks and social distancing were not 100 percent effective against the virus, they were definitely effective at slowing down or preventing the spread of COVID-19.
While these new numbers appear to confirm guidance put out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention regarding preventing the spread of coronavirus, the efficacy of mask-wearing was noticeable early on in the pandemic. One study, for instance, just a few months after social distancing rules had begun, found that the 15 states and Washington, D.C., which issued mask mandates right away saw a significant slowdown in their rates of COVID-19, preventing hundreds of thousands of individuals from contracting the virus.
There is a strong possibility that the politicization of mask-wearing led to a much higher death count in the United States than was necessary. Republicans, particularly former President Donald Trump, viewed wearing a mask as an affront to his presidency. His supporters followed his lead, with many refusing to wear masks while out in public during the pandemic.
Consequently, some have estimated that tens of thousands of COVID deaths in the U.S. could have been prevented with universal mask-wearing.
As of June 7, more than 597,000 Americans have died from coronavirus, with over 33 million having tested positive for it since the pandemic began.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 350 new monthly donors in the next 6 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy