Twelve Republicans and thirteen Democrats crossed party lines in a 52-46 vote against prodding Congress toward examining the allowance of pharmaceutical imports from Canada.
The non-binding resolution failed Wedneday night amid a series of regular procedural considerations — a so-called “vote-a-rama.” Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) sponsored the measure.
The move was a blow for those seeking to ensure access to healthcare, as the Senate also approved of a resolution orienting Congress toward a repeal of Obamacare, in a 51-48 vote.
Notable Democratic defections on the Canada vote included Sens. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the ranking member of the Senate health committee, and Cory Booker (D-N.J.), a rumored 2020 presidential contender.
Booker made history earlier Wednesday, when he became the first senator to testify against a colleague nominated for a cabinet position — Jeff Sessions, Trump’s pick for Attorney General. Sessions has been widely panned for reactionary views on race, and freedom of religion. His outlook on the former saw the senate reject his nomination to the federal judiciary in 1986.
Republicans who voted for the Canada measure included Rand Paul (R-Ky.), John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas.)
Paul also voted against the Affordable Care Act repeal resolution, citing no viable Republican alternative; specifically, the lack of a plan to pay for the repeal.
Speaking in favor of the importation resolution, Sanders said that Canadians often “pay 50 percent less for the same exact medicine that we buy in Vermont or in America.”
“We all know the reason why,” the former presidential candidate added. “The power and wealth of the pharmaceutical industry — and their 1,300 lobbyists and unlimited sums of money — have bought the United States Congress.”
Any move by the US to allow more drug importations from Canada, however, might not be so welcome north of the border.
During the administration of George W. Bush, for example, Ottawa sought to clamp down on exports to the US. The Liberal government of Paul Martin was concerned American consumers were pushing up the price of medicine in Canada.
“It is a matter of common sense that Canada cannot be the drugstore of the United States,” said then-Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh, in 2005. “Neither American consumers nor Canadian suppliers should have any illusions otherwise.”
UPDATE: Sen. Booker defended his vote, in a statement issued Thursday afternoon to Jezebel.
Booker claimed that he voted “no” because Canadian safety standards aren’t up to snuff.
“Any plan to allow the importation of prescription medications should also include consumer protections that ensure foreign drugs meet American safety standards,” Booker said. “I opposed an amendment put forward last night that didn’t meet this test.”
Sen. Klobuchar, however, hit out at this line of reasoning in January 2015, when she supported a previous effort to allow Americans to import pharmaceuticals from Canada.
“The cheaper alternatives [in Canada] come with the same safety standards and are the same dosages sold in the US,” she said two years ago, according to The Wall Street Journal, “but currently law prevents Americans from importing them and benefiting from the savings.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.