When we last saw Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump on the national debate stage, Trump was sniffling his way through his now-standard climate denial routine while Clinton was shimmying her way to viral fame.
A lot has happened in the intervening two weeks.
In Case You Missed It: Here’s What’s Gone Down Since the Last Debate
Monday’s vice presidential debate told us very little, other than that the Republican National Committee needs to get its digital game together. Even so, we still learned quite a bit about the candidates at the top of ticket this week.
For one, closer looks Trump’s financial records — even as we wait on those tax returns — revealed his close connections to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Trump has personally invested somewhere between $500,000 and $1 million in Energy Transfer Partners, the company building the pipeline. Not only that, his top energy adviser Harold Hamm owns the fracking company whose oil would be shipped through the pipeline.
Wow! Trump has multiple ties to the #DakotaAccessPipeline! https://t.co/5K5DRh88Nj #NoDAPL pic.twitter.com/JQICVUfm6C
— Greenpeace USA (@greenpeaceusa) October 5, 2016
Speaking of Hamm, we also learned more this week about the literal garbage fire that makes up Trump’s energy advisory team. His team of climate deniers, oil billionaires, and fossil fuel lobbyists sends a very clear message: a Trump administration would do everything it can to protect polluting industries and increase our dependence on fossil fuels.
Meanwhile on the international stage, we’ve passed the threshold for the Paris Climate Agreement to take effect. Seventy-three nations accounting for 57 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions — including the United States — have fully committed to the agreement.
Finally, the destructive path of Hurricane Matthew has given us a sobering reminder of how real the impacts of climate change are and what’s at stake if our leaders refuse to act.
Neither Trump nor Clinton have commented on the relationship between climate change and disasters like Hurricane Matthew — or the Paris Agreement, or the Dakota Access Pipeline, or anything climate-related — since the last debate. This Sunday, that needs to change.
OK Moderators, No More Playing Around
One big reason we’ve had such little discussion of climate change this election cycle is because debate moderators haven’t asked a single question about it. So we have a message for Sunday’s moderators Anderson Cooper and Martha Raddatz: do better!
We have to do better than this.
Tell moderators to include #climatechange in the next debate! ACT >> https://t.co/LUnto09Nc3 #debates2016 pic.twitter.com/5WL1RJT7fi
— Greenpeace USA (@greenpeaceusa) September 29, 2016
And we’re not alone. Twenty-two thousand of you have signed on to tell Cooper and Raddatz that you want them to ask about climate change this Sunday, and another 23,000 have boosted this question on climate change into the top five (as of publication time) on the Open Debate Coalition’s official crowd-sourcing platform.
As for whether Cooper and Raddatz will note this momentum and finally ask a question on climate change this weekend, we’ll have to watch and find out.
Why We’ll Be Watching the Second Presidential Debate
So far in the general election, Clinton has been coasting on the fact that all she has to do to maintain the gap between her and Trump on environmental issues is reaffirm her belief in climate science. She hasn’t spoken out on the Dakota Access Pipeline, the Paris Climate Agreement, her plan for climate and environmental justice, or how she’ll cut her own ties to the fossil fuel industry.
Until now, she hasn’t had to. That might be good enough to differentiate her from Trump, but it won’t be good enough if she’s elected president.
Our next president needs to keep fossil fuels in the ground and lead the fight against catastrophic climate change from day one. Based on his own statements and the team he’s surrounded himself with, it’s increasingly clear that this is not what a Trump presidency would look like. If Clinton wants to win with climate voters, she’ll use this debate as a chance to show that she’s not just a climate believer, but a leader.
It’s not too late to make your voice heard — tell the debate moderators to ask the candidates about climate change this Sunday!
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.