The Department of Justice (DOJ) said on Wednesday that it has obtained a warrant to search some of the contents of John Eastman’s phone.
Eastman, who formerly served as a lawyer for former President Donald Trump, was an instrumental part of the plot to overturn the 2020 election. In June, he had to surrender his phone to the DOJ after the department obtained a warrant, but another warrant was needed for investigators to look at the phone’s data.
According to a court filing from the DOJ this week, the second warrant was issued on July 12.
Although the warrant allows the DOJ to dig into the data and phone calls that Eastman made after the 2020 presidential election, it does not allow the agency to have total access to all data on the phone. Communications with Trump, which are considered protected under client-attorney privileges, cannot be examined by the department, and will be blocked from viewing by investigators through a filter protocol.
Eastman, who currently resides in New Mexico, sought to block the warrant, but a federal judge in the state ruled against his objections.
In seeking to read the contents of Eastman’s phone, the DOJ “had to specify the crimes it has good cause to believe the contents will reveal,” according to Harvard Law School’s Laurence Tribe.
The investigation into Eastman’s actions is part of a large-scale DOJ inquiry into the events of January 6, 2021, as well as the wider attempt to overturn the 2020 election. Earlier this week, it was reported that the investigation now includes Trump himself.
Eastman played a significant role in the scheme by Trump’s inner circle to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, which was won by now-President Joe Biden. It was Eastman who crafted a memo that detailed a six-point plan to thwart the results; the plan entailed recruiting Trump loyalists to create false elector ballots in states that Biden won and sending them to Washington D.C. to be included in the certification process of the Electoral College. After that, then-Vice President Mike Pence would either count the fake elector votes as legitimate or say that there was enough confusion to warrant sending the matter to the House of Representatives. From there, Trump would undoubtedly have been named president, due to the GOP having a majority of state delegations within the House.
Pence ultimately refused to go along with the plan — and on January 6, after Trump sent a mob of his loyalists to the Capitol to disrupt the certification, dozens chanted for Pence to be hanged for his supposed betrayal of the president.
After the attack on the building, Eastman emailed Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s then-personal lawyer, to ask if he could be included “on the pardon list, if that is still in the works.”
So far, Eastman has been uncooperative with any investigation involving the plot to overturn the election or the attack on the Capitol. Although Eastman has sat with the January 6 committee, he invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination throughout his deposition.
Some observers believe that Eastman may choose to cooperate with investigators in light of the recent warrant from the DOJ, however — particularly if he believes that cooperation will help him out of criminal liability or reduce a prison sentence.
“John Eastman is in many ways the linchpin of this investigation…if poor John Eastman could determine that he would be better off working with the Department of Justice than staying on Team Trump, that would be an immensely important step for the investigation,”
Paul Rosenzweig, a former attorney who investigated former President Bill Clinton, said on CNN Wednesday night.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.