Syriza has taken power in Greece and Podemos is rising in Spain. And now, people in the Republic of Ireland are fighting back as well, notwithstanding the “model pupil” label ascribed to the country by European elites.
The austerity program imposed by the troika of the European Commission, European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund starting in 2010 stipulated that charges for households’ water consumption should be introduced – a plan that the right-wing government now in power is implementing. Notwithstanding public pronouncements to the contrary, the plan is most likely to eventually privatize Irish Water, the public utility set up to charge citizens for water.
This has provoked a strong popular movement against water charges. Its importance cannot be overstated; it is simply “the largest and broadest, and most sustained, social movement in Ireland since independence in 1921,” as an important new report concludes. Communities have been attempting to block the installation of water meters in neighborhoods throughout the country. Nationally, five demonstrations have gathered between 20,000 and 150,000 people. Relative to population, a protest of 100,000 in Ireland is equivalent to 1 million in Spain. Indeed, we are witnessing the “birth of a new civil society.”
The movement has made important gains already. It has forced the government to reduce the average annual charges from 278 to 160 euros per household. But protesters want to abolish Irish Water entirely and keep water – which after all, is not in short supply on the Emerald Isle – free. Fully one-third of households liable to pay the charge, or about 500,000, have refused to register to pay. Protest groups hope that this boycott will force the government to cancel its plans, being unable to process such a high number of payment refusals.
The opposition movement is important because it started from the bottom-up in communities around the country. In November, more than 100 local protests linked to Right2Water took place, gathering more than 150,000 people.
The protests erupted in such a way because water charges are the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back in the seemingly never-ending austerity measures that have affected so many aspects of community life. For example:
– According to official statistics, 30.5 percent of the population is now suffering from deprivation – up from 12 percent in 2007.
– Health spending was cut by 27 percent between 2009 and 2014.
– Communities have faced a series of cuts between 2008 and 2014, including cuts to:
– a violence against women program: -38.2 percent
– women’s organizations: -48.7 percent
– projects for youth: -44.1 percent
– community development: -43.6 percent
– voluntary social housing: -50.0 percent
– drug programs: -37.0 percent
– family support agency: -32.5 percent
Another reason why the protests have emerged at the grassroots level: Normal institutional channels on the left to voice discontent and popular aspirations have been closed off in Ireland due to the conservative nature of such groups and their co-optation by the government. For example, the traditional left political parties (Labor and the Greens) have supported water charges, while many key trade unions and civil society organizations and charities have chosen simply not to oppose them.
A few more progressive unions and political parties, together with community groups, have thus joined together to lead the opposition to water charges. The networks formed promise to survive beyond the current struggle and have positive consequences on popular organizing and action for years to come.
A report surveyed 2,500 people involved in the protests and found that 54 percent of respondents had never protested before joining the water charge opposition movement. This indicates that people are becoming politicized and are aware that many others around the country are also opposed to Irish Water.
Also, 92 percent said they wouldn’t pay their water charges and 83 percent mentioned they would vote for broadly left parties in the next election, including the Anti-Austerity Alliance, People Before Profit, independents and Sinn Fein. A clear majority said they had voted for government parties in 2011, but would not repeat that mistake again. Seventy-eight percent said the most effective way of changing things in Ireland is through protesting, against only 28 percent who said it is by contacting a political representative, pointing to the high level of disillusion toward mainstream institutions.
In short, if there is one thing that unites Ireland, it is lack of trust in the political class. The campaign against water charges is now attempting to build on this resentment and channel it effectively to influence policy.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.