The city that raised me is changing. Over the years I have watched Birmingham, Alabama, transform in many different ways. My hometown periodically captures the nation’s attention during discussions about civil rights or its high murder rate. I recently saw images of Birmingham appear frequently during the uprisings in Ferguson, Missouri. People made comparisons to Jim Crow Birmingham without really knowing much about the city today. It’s a city that has often displayed abandonment, disrepair and mismanagement. Today, its government is boldly evoking a word of great political significance during this era, stating to the world that the city is moving 50 years “forward.” This 2013 proclamation marked the 50th year after 1963, when things were much different. However, some questions about what needs to be changed remain.
For the last couple of years I have watched Birmingham transform from afar as I traveled back and forth, living in Washington, DC, and then the borough of Brooklyn. Seeing Birmingham change was intensified by the fact that I was living in places undergoing some serious transformations of their own. These two areas, like other predominantly black areas around the country, are seeing an influx of white newcomers, generating a national conversation about gentrification. Now, it’s happening where I’m from. The more I returned home, the more white people I saw downtown.
Suddenly, the fearful unwelcoming gazes I once thought were more exclusive to the suburbs where I grew up are now being directed toward me in parts of downtown Birmingham that white people once avoided. Areas like the Northside were desolate at night and off limits to my white classmates who told me their parents warned them they could “get shot.” I heard things like this frequently as a working-class child of two black parents. Though it wasn’t always explicitly stated, I was well aware what city inhabitants I was supposed to be wary of. It didn’t take much for a black kid like myself to understand I was not necessarily wanted in communities that are still adamant about segregating their children. Alabama is second in the nation for desegregation lawsuits. The county where I’m from is the same infamous county that recently gutted the Civil Rights Act, if that tells you anything about the mindset that still exists.
Naturally, because white supremacy still exists, things are becoming much nicer now. White citizenry are starting to appear in predominantly black neighborhoods and cities like Birmingham. With white people come wealth and newfound concern. Upon my return, I noticed things I had fought for prior to my departure had changed overnight. Buses are running more frequently, but still to the inconvenience of mostly working-class black folks. The city is also cleaner and people are coming back downtown to spend money. People from the suburbs “over the mountain” are returning to the city their predecessors fled in fear of integration and intermingling with blacks. The city that was being starved suddenly deserves a meal and it’s being fed by the acquisitive interests of the same class that’s driving the reclamation trend nationwide.
Cities like Birmingham, with predominantly black administrations, are often seen around the country as pictures of failure and fault. Black mayors seem to often be the face of corruption. Despite the fact that they are not necessarily more corrupt than their white counterparts, they definitely seem to get caught disproportionately. Former mayors like Detroit’s Kwame Kilpatrick, DC’s Marion Barry, and most recently New Orleans’ own Ray Nagan often serve as examples of failed black leadership for white flight apologists. Birmingham has not been much different with its former mayor Larry Langford currently serving a 15-year federal felony sentence. So with suburbanites returning, there is a veiled racism in assuming that newcomers are cleaning up what they purposely deserted.
Recognizing this disturbing trend of viewing black administrations as infantile in their management of cities is important because that view derails discussions from focusing on economic racism. It also erases the sinister intentions of depraved Wall Street forces that helped debilitate Jefferson County’s sewer system leaving it with an over $1 billion debt. When poor blacks in Birmingham recently had a “third world” water crisis much like what Detroit is currently experiencing, it seemed like no one noticed. Yet, these neglected black folks who are directly descended from the Birmingham civil rights struggle make fine props when the country needs historic inspiration or a political footnote. Black communities like Birmingham’s throughout the country have been systematically segregated, exploited and driven into desperation by white flight. In every major city where whites fled racial change, they took resources and wealth with them. It’s easier for some to forget this history than others. But the city is still quite segregated and black people are still facing environmental threats.
However, people can gleefully return to the once-blood-stained streets of Birmingham to buy cheap property and talk about progress. And for a city that capitalizes on its civil rights history, black bodies that were once strange fruit will become ingredients for a new slice of American pie. Blacks who are displaced by expansion, new commerce and lofts will be told they should consider themselves lucky to have equal opportunity housing like Birmingham’s Hope VI housing. And this will happen to the tune of “let’s put the past behind us.”
Real progress in Birmingham will be defined by how the city addresses its history of mistreating black people in the past and present. Cities are destined to change and it should not have to be a bad thing. However, we cannot say we are moving “forward” while ignoring the very people who have been trampled on and disenfranchised. If Birmingham is to be a playground for wealthy white people once again, while working-class blacks, the homeless and people below the poverty line are pushed out, we are not moving forward; we’re still going backward. We should let our city’s civil rights history serve as a guiding principle for equality and not just a tourist attraction. Fire hoses and bombs that tore into black flesh did not wash or burn away the sins of a generation that ran from their hate rather than address it.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.