Skip to content Skip to footer
|

The Crimea Crisis Offers President Obama a Chance to Retroactively Earn His Nobel Peace Prize

This newfound inclination to give peace a chance in the Crimea stand off with Russia illustrates what President Barack Obama meant during his State of the Union speech when he said, “America must move off a permanent war footing.”

Leave No War Behind, an OtherWords cartoon by Khalil Bendib.

It’s hard to get your mind wrapped around Russia’s annexation of Crimea and seizure of Ukrainian military bases there. It was — and many Ukrainians say still is — part of a neighboring sovereign country until mid-March.

And it seemed like Europe had transcended that kind of old-school warmongering.

Leave No War Behind, an OtherWords cartoon by Khalil Bendib.Leave No War Behind, an OtherWords cartoon by Khalil Bendib.

Just two years back, the Nobel Committee awarded the Peace Prize to the European Union for ending such conflict on its own turf and “for over six decades (contributing) to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe.”

Easy come, easy go.

This isn’t turning into World War III — at least not yet. The United States and EU are responding with economic sanctions and talking about ramping them up.

“Our interest is not in seeing the situation escalate and devolve into hot conflict,” White House national security adviser Susan Rice said. “Our interest is in a diplomatic resolution, de-escalation, and obviously economic support for Ukraine, and to the extent that it continues to be necessary, further costs imposed on Russia for its actions.”

Booting Russia from the G-8 cluster of the world’s most powerful nations is one of those “costs.” At least for now, the club is back in G-7 mode.

This newfound inclination to give peace a chance illustrates what President Barack Obama meant during his State of the Union speech when he said, “America must move off a permanent war footing.”

There are other signs that Washington has had it with big wars.

The last U.S. troops left Iraq more than two years ago. American forces remaining in Afghanistan could leave by the end of 2014. Cooler heads (not ours, unfortunately) prevailed in Syria, and Obama seems ready to back away from attacking Iran.

But don’t get your hopes up.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, deemed by all polls and most pundits to be the Democratic Party’s frontrunner in the 2016 presidential race, just declared that “every other option does remain on the table” with Iran, including military action.

And, unfortunately, the United States remains up to its elbows in less publicized bloodshed and smaller-scale military actions.

Our drones assassinate in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia. Our special forces kill in Libya, Honduras, Colombia, Syria, and who knows where else. We have hundreds, maybe more than 1,000 overseas military bases operating in more than 63 countries. No one can really determine how many there are, where they all are, or exactly what they do.

The United States remains by far the No. 1 exporter of weapons. These arms flood many war zones, sometimes on both sides.

In 2012, Uncle Sam started to lavish a little less on the Pentagon, yet still led the world in military spending — forking over about 40 percent of the global war budget.

Just keeping track of whom exactly we’re at war with is a perennial challenge for the American public. We all should realize that people are dying at our hands, but most of us tune out that sad fact.

Likewise, Americans struggle to acknowledge the devastation of our past wars. The mainstream media now seems mystified as to why so many children are starving in Afghanistan after we destroyed its economy.

And our government never truly acknowledged the consequences of spraying Agent Orange defoliant in Vietnam for the locals in remote villages. Four decades later, it still hasn’t officially recognized the damage done to U.S. service members either. Many of them were exposed to the toxic stuff when they either flew or worked with the aircraft that dispersed Agent Orange as a weapon.

Just because this happens to be the world’s most powerful nation doesn’t mean we must also be the most aggressive. The carnage of war, big or small, makes the price of military action too high.

Obama should keep simmering down the Pentagon’s exploits. It’s the best way he can retroactively earn that Peace Prize he won in 2009 for what the Nobel committee deemed to be “his important efforts, on several continents and over more than three decades, to resolve international conflicts.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.