Skip to content Skip to footer

Texas AG Paxton Sues 5 Cities to Block Marijuana Decriminalization Ordinances

Despite Paxton’s lawsuit, polls show that two-thirds of Texans support legalizing recreational marijuana.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference held at the Hilton Anatole on July 11, 2021, in Dallas, Texas.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) is suing five cities in the state to block recently passed ordinances that decriminalize the possession of cannabis.

Voters in Austin, San Marcos, Killeen, Elgin and Denton approved similar ballot measures in the 2022 election cycle that end arrests for low-level marijuana-based crimes and eliminate citations for possession of less than four ounces of cannabis. The measures were coordinated by a progressive organization in the state called Ground Game Texas.

The measures were overwhelmingly supported by voters in these jurisdictions, ranging from a high of 85 percent support in Austin to 70 percent support in Killeen.

This week, however, Paxton announced he would seek to block those popular ordinances, claiming that they violated Texas state law and the state constitution.

The cities involved in the lawsuit are “home-rule” jurisdictions, which means they have the full power of self-government. (“General law” cities can only pass ordinances that the state government explicitly says they’re allowed to enact.) There are exceptions to this standard, however, which Paxton alleges the jurisdictions have violated.

The attorney general used extreme language to attack the cities for allowing their residents to decide for themselves whether to decriminalize cannabis laws in their jurisdictions.

“I will not stand idly by as cities run by pro-crime extremists deliberately violate Texas law and promote the use of illicit drugs that harm our communities,” Paxton said in a press release, further describing the actions by the cities as “anarchy.”

Critics decried Paxton’s efforts, noting that marijuana decriminalization and legalization efforts are popular throughout the state, and that laws prohibiting the possession of marijuana target marginalized communities at much higher rates.

“Prosecution of low level marijuana offenses disproportionately effects minorities,” said Sara Spector, a political commentator and criminal defense attorney from Texas.

“Ken Paxton’s lawsuits represent an anti-democratic assault on the constitutional authority of Texas Home Rule cities to set local law enforcement priorities,” Julie Oliver, executive director for Ground Game Texas, said in a press release.

“Paxton’s slander of so-called ‘pro-crime’ organizations that support marijuana reform policies is profoundly ironic coming from a person who is under criminal indictment for securities fraud, under federal investigation for other financial crimes, and has admitted to violating the civil rights of whistleblowers within his own office,” Oliver added.

Polling from the state shows that the vast majority of Texans would approve of legalizing marijuana for recreational use. A Hobby School of Public Affairs poll from early 2023, for example, found that two-thirds of residents (67 percent) would back legalizing marijuana recreationally for anyone over the age of 21.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.