Skip to content Skip to footer

Tennessee Bill Seeks to Bar Localities From Reappointing Expelled Legislators

The bill appears to be a direct response to Republicans being unable to permanently expel two Black lawmakers in 2023.

Democratic state Rep. Justin Jones of Nashville gestures during a vote on his expulsion from the state legislature at the State Capitol Building on April 6, 2023, in Nashville, Tennessee.

After failing last year to permanently expel two Black state lawmakers over a protest for gun reform, Republicans in the Tennessee House of Representatives have advanced a bill that would bar the re-appointment of lawmakers to their formerly held positions.

Last spring, a trio of Democrats who became known as the “Tennessee Three” — Reps. Justin Jones, Justin Pearson and Gloria Johnson — staged a protest on the state House floor, using a bullhorn to lead audience members in the gallery in chants. The protest, which lasted just a few minutes, was aimed at pressuring GOP lawmakers to agree to a set of gun legislation reforms following a mass shooting at a Nashville school a week prior in which three adults and three children were killed.

After Speaker of the House Cameron Sexton (R) recessed, the House reconvened an hour after the protest without further disruption. But the action so offended Republicans that they held votes to expel the Tennessee Three soon after.

Both Pearson and Jones, who are Black, were expelled. The vote to expel Johnson, who is white, fell short of the two-thirds majority required. Johnson herself recognized that she likely survived the expulsion vote due to racism within the GOP conference.

State law requires jurisdictions of House districts where vacancies occur to appoint someone to complete a lawmaker’s term. Both Jones and Pearson were reappointed by their localities to their positions.

House Bill 2716, sponsored by Republican Rep. Johnny Garrett — who also led the charge to expel the Tennessee Three last year — seeks to restrict local governments from reappointing lawmakers to their seats of power.

The bill passed the GOP-dominated state House of Representatives by a vote of 69-22, despite a legislative legal counsel warning lawmakers that it is likely unconstitutional. Republicans in support of the bill scoffed at those concerns.

“There’s always people who question the constitutionality of stuff. We’ll see,” said Sexton.

Debate on the bill prior to its passage was contentious, with Sexton blocking Pearson from completing his thoughts on the measure after he described it as a “racist reaction” to him and Jones standing up to the GOP last year. Jones was not allowed to speak on the measure at all.

Jason Powell, another Democratic state House member who opposes the bill, lambasted Republicans for seeking to pass a measure that wouldn’t be legal under the state’s highest governing document.

“This bill is unconstitutional, and my community is sick and tired of being pushed around by people who don’t respect the constitution,” Powell said.

To address the legality question, the state House also passed a measure that would enshrine the bill’s rule into the state constitution. That measure passed, but won’t be enforced until it is passed in the next session of the state legislature, after which voters must approve of it before it becomes law.

It’s anyone’s guess at the moment how Tennesseans would vote on the constitutional measure. A Vanderbilt University poll from last year didn’t specifically address that question, but did ask voters whether or not they believed the lawmakers should be expelled. The state was split, according to the poll, with a plurality, 49 percent, saying that it was wrong for Republicans to attempt to remove Pearson and Jones, and 46 percent saying they agreed with the move.

The poll suggests that Tennessee voters could also be upset by Republicans trying to deny local governments of the right to select whomever they want to fill legislative vacancies, including lawmakers who were expelled; this right is viewed as a “check” on the state legislature, protecting against political abuses by the majority party that largely has the ability to block voters’ preferences due to partisan gerrymandering.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy