You almost had to be on Mars last week to have missed San Francisco 49er rookie Chris Borland making football history. He did not make a breathtaking play. Instead, the talented, promising young inside linebacker quit the NFL at age 24.
Why did he do that? Chris Borland hadn’t stopped loving football. It turns out he’d had two concussions before the NFL draft in college, then a third during practice. Instead of waiting until he fell victim, like too many pro-football players, to grave, irreversible brain damage, Borland announced his proactive retirement. Despite the thrill of the game, great pride in his team, the roar of the crowd and future millions, he’d concluded the risk was not worth the reward.
Pundits warn us not to make too much of this. Borland, we’re told, is unlikely to start a trend. Even if he does, lots of NFL wannabes are waiting in the wings.
But Chris Borland’s announcement opened Pandora’s box. He bravely named something we all see, but collectively deny: despite significant short-term rewards, USS football today is a violent, dangerous game.
In organizational dynamics, sometimes two forces combine to shake up the status quo. One’s called a weak signal. Often dismissed by those in the know, weak signals upend business as usual to affect how, what and where we operate. The other’s a wild card, an unlikely, high-impact event that increases a group’s ability to adapt to a turbulent environment, like today’s NFL. Borland’s announcement, part weak signal, part wild card, could be a real turning point for pro-football.
Now imagine a throng of microphones like the one that greeted Borland projecting the voice of a top fossil fuel exec. What if one man quit, as Borland did, because like Borland, he can no longer accept what we all see but avoid? What if one industry leader embraced clean energy, before he and the rest of us were overwhelmed by the irreversible pain and suffering of climate change?
Living on earth, like football, is a contact sport. The harm, though, is not just to the players, but to all of us who fill the stands and watch at home.
While it may not have been his intent, Chris Borland may well have sparked change far beyond the NFL. Before Borland, a fossil fuel executive who freely chose to give up wealth and power to tackle climate change was almost unthinkable. Perhaps Borland’s fossil fuel industry counterpart, inspired by this courageous young man, is even now suiting up for his own game-changing announcement.
If he does, it won’t be the first time a weak signal reshapes the future.
So here’s the question: What will come first? A future without football – or one where we’ve swapped fossil fuels for clean energy, thanks to a brave inside linebacker?
As the late Nelson Mandela observed, “it always seems impossible, until it’s done.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.