Skip to content Skip to footer

Supreme Court Upholds Republican Purge of Voter Rolls in Virginia

“The Supreme Court just ignored a key provision of the National Voter Registration Act,” a civil rights attorney said.

A polling place sign is displayed outside a polling location on the first day of Virginia's in-person early voting at Long Bridge Park Aquatics and Fitness Center on September 20, 2024, in Arlington, Virginia.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order on Wednesday lifting an injunction against Virginia Republican officials’ attempt to purge hundreds of names from voter registration rolls across the state.

The unsigned order means that those officials can push forward with their removal of names from voter registration rolls just days before the conclusion of the 2024 election — disenfranchising an unknown number of eligible voters in the process.

“The application for stay presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is granted,” the court’s order said.

It’s unclear which of the nine justices ruled for lower courts’ stays to be lifted. However, all three liberal bloc members — Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — indicated that they would deny the application to block the lower courts’ rulings.

The purge, which was initiated by an executive order from Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) in August to ostensibly remove ineligible, noncitizen voters from the rolls, targeted names on Department of Motor Vehicle forms where individuals had indicated they were immigrants or had otherwise left that space blank. However, it’s possible that, since those forms have been processed, individuals who indicated they were immigrants have since become naturalized citizens, and that those who didn’t indicate their status skipped the question by accident.

Indeed, a lawsuit jointly made by the federal Department of Justice (DOJ) and several civil rights groups identified dozens of people who were improperly removed from voter rolls.

Lawrence Otey, a resident of Roanoke, Virginia, who has been voting for decades, was one of the voters purged from the rolls. “I’ve been voting since Jimmy Carter,” he told Cardinal News.

Unfortunately, he mistakenly checked a box on a DMV form indicating he was a “non-U.S. citizen,” resulting in his voter registration being removed.

“Don’t get old,” Otey advised potential voters in Virginia.

Nadra Wilson of Lynchburg, Virginia, was similarly removed from the voter rolls despite being born in the U.S. “I was born in Brooklyn, New York — I’m a citizen,” she told NPR.

Wilson was sent a mailer from the state indicating she had time to rectify the situation. But that mailer was sent to the wrong address, and by the time it reached her, the deadline to fix the mistake had passed.

Wilson described the situation as “very, very unfair.”

Despite these and dozens of other known examples of eligible voters being purged from the rolls, Youngkin celebrated the Supreme Court ruling, describing it as a “victory for commonsense and election fairness” in the state.

Civil rights organizations involved in the initial lawsuit condemned the ruling.

“To say this decision is a disappointment is an understatement. The Supreme Court just ignored a key provision of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and the clear fact that Virginia purged eligible voters on the eve of the election,” said Ryan Snow, an attorney with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

The Supreme Court’s order is bewildering, as the NVRA is clearly written to block states, no matter the reason, from removing names from voter registration rolls within 90 days of any federal election. The ruling now has the potential to create dangerous precedent for states to challenge that restriction in the future.

Voters who have been purged can re-register to vote, as Virginia is one of 22 states in the country that allows same-day voter registration. But for many voters who believe they are registered to vote and actually aren’t (you can check your status here), the purging of their names from the voter rolls creates an additional, time-consuming hurdle to casting a ballot, especially if they don’t have the documents required to register at their polling location on Election Day.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy