Offering no explanation for their ruling, the five conservative justices who hold the majority on the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Alabama state officials Wednesday night in a decision banning curbside voting in the state.
The ruling will bar counties including Democratic-leaning Montgomery and Jefferson from allowing voters with disabilities or who are at risk of severe, potentially fatal Covid-19 infections from remaining in their cars when they go to the polls to vote in person rather than voting by mail.
Sam Spital of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, whose client, Howard Porter Jr., was a plaintiff in the case, called the decision an “outrageous 5-3 ruling that puts Alabama voters at risk.”
An outrageous 5-3 ruling that puts Alabama voters at risk. Our @NAACP_LDF client Mr. Porter, Jr., a Black man in his 70s w/asthma & Parkinson’s testified: “‘[S]o many of my [ancestors] even died to vote. And while I don’t mind dying to vote, I think . . . we’re past that time.’” https://t.co/noJ27SoqXy
— Sam Spital (@SamSpital) October 22, 2020
The conservative majority blocked a district court injunction that simply allowed Alabama counties that are willing to provide curbside voting–which is widely available throughout the country and far safer for high-risk voters–to do so.
— Sam Spital (@SamSpital) October 22, 2020
This decision risks the safety of Alabama voters, especially Black voters, who are disproportionately at risk for COVID complications due to systemic discrimination. And it disrespects the district court, which considered the issues in a 197 pg opinion after 2 weeks of trial.
— Sam Spital (@SamSpital) October 22, 2020
The counties have sought for months to allow curbside voting, in which voters would hand their ballots to a poll worker to avoid having to wait in a crowded polling place and increasing their chances of being exposed to the coronavirus.
Secretary of State John Merrill, who has sought to ban the practice, applauded the Supreme Court ruling and called the decision a victory for “election integrity and security” and for “the people of Alabama” — but the five conservative justices did not explain in their ruling how election security might be threatened by a voter receiving assistance from a poll worker while remaining in their car instead of waiting in a crowd of people during a pandemic.
In her dissent on behalf of the three liberal justices, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the Supreme Court has now flouted public health recommendations by the CDC, which has urged states to adopt curbside voting to prevent the spread of Covid-19.
“This is no radical recommendation,” Sotomayor wrote. “The Department of Justice has sanctioned curbside voting as a remedy to ADA violations, and some 28 States and the District of Columbia already permit curbside voting… The Alabama secretary of state, however, has prohibited counties from offering curbside voting, even for voters with disabilities for whom Covid–19 is disproportionately likely to be fatal. If those vulnerable voters wish to vote in person, they must wait inside, for as long as it takes, in a crowd of fellow voters whom Alabama does not require to wear face coverings.”
Sotomayor also noted that Merrill has never “meaningfully” disputed that forcing voters with disabilities and pre-existing health conditions to vote in person in the traditional manner could prove fatal this year.
The Supreme Court ruling overturned two lower federal court rulings which stated that Merrill’s ban on curbside voting was a violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act, granting state officials a stay of those orders.
Outraged disability rights advocates said the ruling will force people with disabilities “to choose between voting and staying alive.”
Disabled people shouldn’t have to choose between voting and staying alive. https://t.co/5JENCNuelQ
— Margaux Joffe (she/her) (@MargauxJoffe) October 22, 2020
Curbside voting was the safest option for many disabled people. Today, the Supreme Court decided to block it. This is ableist! Disabled people shouldn’t have to die to vote! I’m furious. #CripTheVote #Accessibility #SCOTUS #Disability #ADA #a11y #Alabama https://t.co/YqEgFvrW6d
— Haben Girma (@HabenGirma) October 22, 2020
Kristen Clarke, executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, noted that the conservative justices had ruled from the safety of their homes against voters who aim to protect themselves from severe Covid-19 infections.
BREAKING: By a 5-3 vote, Supreme Court BLOCKS a lower court order that allowed voters in Alabama to cast ballots by way of curbside voting in those localities that sought to make these accommodations available.
Reminder – the Supreme Court is still operating remotely. #COVID19
— Kristen Clarke 866-OUR-VOTE (@KristenClarkeJD) October 22, 2020
“Reminder: the Supreme Court is still operating remotely,” Clarke tweeted.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $120,000 in one-time donations and to add 1383 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy