Supreme Court Justice Stevens Will Retire in June

Washington – Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens announced his retirement Friday, setting up a long-anticipated confirmation battle during the most sensitive of political seasons.

Stevens, who’ll turn 90 on April 20, said that after 34 years on the high court it was time to step down.

“It would be in the best interests of the court to have my successor appointed and confirmed well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term,” Stevens said in a letter to President Barack Obama.

A Supreme Court representative conveyed Stevens’ letter to the White House at about 10:30 a.m. Friday. White House Counsel Bob Bauer called Obama with the news, reaching the president aboard Air Force One as Obama was returning from the nuclear treaty signing in Prague.

Stevens’ departure in June at the end of the 2009-10 term will remove from the court its most senior justice as well as the linchpin of what’s now the liberal wing. Stevens’ retirement also will ensure that the Supreme Court is front and center during the upcoming midterm congressional elections.

For conservatives and liberals alike, the pending court vacancy will become a way to mobilize the troops as well as to wage proxy fights over hot-button issues, including abortion and wartime security.

For Obama, the vacancy provides a challenge and an opportunity.

Republicans are eager to unite around an issue that will engage their conservative base. The president’s Democratic Party controls 59 seats, one short of the number that’s needed to stop a filibuster. In a break with tradition, some senators have signaled that they wouldn’t be reluctant to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee.

Stevens’ departure also provides Obama a second chance to shape the court with a relatively young justice who’ll be interpreting the Constitution for the next several decades. Because of Stevens’ relatively left-of-center position, the new justice may not tip the court’s overall ideological balance.

“I hope that senators on both sides of the aisle will make this process a thoughtful and civil discourse,” said Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Americans can expect Senate Republicans to make a sustained and vigorous case for judicial restraint and the fundamental importance of an evenhanded reading of the law,” cautioned Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

The experience of the president’s first court choice, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, may foreshadow the political conflict to come. Thirty-one Republicans opposed her, including some who’d traditionally crossed party lines to approve Democratic choices in the past.

Nine Republicans voted for Sotomayor.

Gary Jacobson, a political scientist at the University of California, San Diego, put it this way: “Given the track record of the Senate Republicans, anybody Obama supports is going to be attacked. They’re geared up for battle. The question is can Republicans oppose the nominee without embarrassing themselves too much.”

Having named Sotomayor as the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court, Obama now could make more history.

The nine-member court has never had more than two women serving at a time. Obama can change that if he reinforces Sotomayor and the 77-year-old Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a female nominee. Several possibilities exist.

A very serious contender is Solicitor General Elena Kagan, the first woman to hold that prestigious post as well as the first female dean of Harvard Law School. An appellate judge who was considered seriously last year, Diane Wood of the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, knows Obama from their teaching at the University of Chicago Law School.

The president might name a second Hispanic justice, Judge Kim Wardlaw of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm comes from the non-appellate world, which Obama has said he’d like to make use of.

Alternatively, the president might try to name the first Asian-American to the court. Although only seven Asian-Americans are serving on the federal bench, the president could search elsewhere; for instance, by tapping his top State Department lawyer, former Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh.

Regardless of whom the president nominates, a fight is all but guaranteed. Currently, only six of Obama’s 15 appellate court nominees have been confirmed.

The last unanimously approved Supreme Court justice was Anthony Kennedy, 22 years ago. The deeply conservative top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, was himself rejected by Democrats when he was nominated to the federal bench, and midterm election years generally only harden positions.

Stevens’ retirement announcement wasn’t unexpected. He’d hired only one law clerk for next year, instead of the customary four. He would’ve had to serve roughly another year to become either the oldest or the longest-serving Supreme Court justice.

The longest-serving justice will remain William O. Douglas, whose seat Stevens took after President Gerald Ford nominated him in 1975.

At the time, Stevens was serving on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A Northwestern University Law School graduate and Navy veteran of World War II, he was deemed a conventionally moderate Midwestern Republican at the time.

Stevens “has earned the gratitude and admiration of the American people for his nearly 40 years of distinguished service to the judiciary, including more than 34 years on the Supreme Court,” Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. said Friday. “He has enriched the lives of everyone at the court through his intellect, independence and warm grace.”

McClatchy White House Correspondent Margaret Talev also contributed to this report.