A new analysis from a number of law and political science professors finds that, if current trends continue, the liberal bloc of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court will remain in the minority until at least 2065, barring any immediate reforms.
The study sought to examine the potential outcomes of “court packing,” or increasing the number of Supreme Court justices beyond the current nine in order to achieve political ends.
Many political observers have said that adding justices to the Supreme Court is necessary in order to combat the Court’s extremist rightward shift in recent years due to undemocratic GOP maneuvering to rush through conservative nominees and block nominees by Democratic presidents.
The study was authored by Dan Epps and Kyle Rozema, law professors at Washington University in St. Louis; Adam Chilton, a law professor from the University of Chicago Law School; and Maya Sen, a political science professor from Harvard.
One of the paper’s key findings was that the Supreme Court’s conservative bloc will remain in power for at least the next four decades if current trends continue and lawmakers fail to implement reforms.
“Our paper uses simulations based on assumptions about the results of elections, justice retirement, etc to predict what might happen with the Supreme Court’s composition for the next century,” Epps wrote at the start of a series of tweets explaining the paper.
“Our findings have a lot of relevance for policymakers interested in Court expansion. But one particularly salient one: without Court expansion, Democrats are unlikely to retain control of the Court until…2065,” Epps added.
Epps cited Republican senators’ obstruction of nominations during the Obama administration and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s refusal to retire before her passing as instrumental in determining that the Court will likely remain under conservative control in the coming generations.
“Had RBG retired under a D president (or had Garland been confirmed),” Epps wrote, “Democrats would likely have retaken control by 2029, and would control the Court for about half of the next century.”
Judiciary observers noted that Democrats should respond to the analysis by endorsing reforms to ensure that the Court better represents the viewpoints of the American public— including increasing its size.
“I’d love to hear a Democratic senator who opposes Supreme Court expansion get asked about this study, and then watch them explain with a straight face why they’re ceding control of the Court to far-right ideologues until their grandchildren reach retirement age,” wrote Jay Willis, editor-in-chief for Balls & Strikes, a progressive website that examines the judicial branch.
If the analysis’s projections are correct, it would mean that, by the time 2065 rolls around, the Supreme Court will have been under conservative bloc control for nearly a century, as the Court has been controlled by conservatives since 1970.
Although Republicans have won just four of the past nine presidential election cycles (two of which they won without the popular vote), Republican presidents have selected seven of the past 12 Supreme Court justices since 1989.
Polls show that most Americans are open to Supreme Court reform. An AP-NORC poll published last July, for example, found that two-thirds of Americans (67 percent) backed the idea of instituting tenure limits for Supreme Court justices instead of allowing them to serve lifetime appointments. This support was bipartisan, with 82 percent of Democrats in the poll and 57 percent of Republican respondents saying they were in favor of tenure limits.
Americans also support measures to increase the size of the Court beyond its current nine members. A Marquette Law School poll published in September found that 51 percent of Americans supported expanding the Court, in spite of reservations from politicians on both sides of the political aisle in Washington.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $130,000 in one-time donations and to add 1422 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy